<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BMC&#8217;s Impact Factors: Elsevier&#8217;s Take and Reactions to It</title>
	<atom:link href="http://digital-scholarship.org/digitalkoans/2005/07/11/bmcs-impact-factors-elseviers-take-and-reactions-to-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://digital-scholarship.org/digitalkoans/2005/07/11/bmcs-impact-factors-elseviers-take-and-reactions-to-it/</link>
	<description>What Is the Sound of One E-Print Downloading?</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 15:17:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://digital-scholarship.org/digitalkoans/2005/07/11/bmcs-impact-factors-elseviers-take-and-reactions-to-it/comment-page-1/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2005 16:35:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-scholarship.org/digitalkoans/?p=57#comment-60</guid>
		<description>Peter Suber in his &lt;a href="http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/2005_07_10_fosblogarchive.html#a112118326301911455" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;i&gt;Open Access News&lt;/i&gt; posting about this piece&lt;/a&gt; said:

&lt;blockquote&gt;I'd only add that it's important to distinguish the citation impact of an individual article from a journal impact factor. The BMC-Elsevier debate is about the latter. But OA is more likely to rise and fall according to the former. &lt;a href="http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate/24.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;Authors control&lt;/a&gt; the rate at which we move toward OA and they care more about the impact of their own work than the average impact of the authors who publish in the same journal.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter Suber in his <a href="http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/2005_07_10_fosblogarchive.html#a112118326301911455" rel="nofollow"><i>Open Access News</i> posting about this piece</a> said:</p>
<blockquote><p>I&#8217;d only add that it&#8217;s important to distinguish the citation impact of an individual article from a journal impact factor. The BMC-Elsevier debate is about the latter. But OA is more likely to rise and fall according to the former. <a href="http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate/24.html" rel="nofollow">Authors control</a> the rate at which we move toward OA and they care more about the impact of their own work than the average impact of the authors who publish in the same journal.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
