Comments on: The Google Print Controversy: A Bibliography http://digital-scholarship.org/digitalkoans/2005/10/25/the-google-print-controversy-a-bibliography/ What Is the Sound of One E-Print Downloading? Mon, 15 Feb 2010 19:47:02 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: ResourceShelf » Google’s Library Project Turns 2 Years Old; Yahoo Answers Celebrates First Birthday http://digital-scholarship.org/digitalkoans/2005/10/25/the-google-print-controversy-a-bibliography/comment-page-1/#comment-104 ResourceShelf » Google’s Library Project Turns 2 Years Old; Yahoo Answers Celebrates First Birthday Thu, 14 Dec 2006 00:13:33 +0000 http://digital-scholarship.org/digitalkoans/?p=97#comment-104 [...] Important! What follows are only a few highlights from the first two years. By NO means is this a complete list of every news item that has come along in the first 730 days. For every item we listed, we could have listed 20 more. Not even close. From more items, Charles W. Bailey’s “The Google Print Controversy: A Bibliography”. Links to many more articles, primary docs, etc. Kudos to Mr. Bailey for compiling this resource. [...] [...] Important! What follows are only a few highlights from the first two years. By NO means is this a complete list of every news item that has come along in the first 730 days. For every item we listed, we could have listed 20 more. Not even close. From more items, Charles W. Bailey’s “The Google Print Controversy: A Bibliography”. Links to many more articles, primary docs, etc. Kudos to Mr. Bailey for compiling this resource. [...]

]]> By: ResourceShelf » Google’s Launch of Library Book Digitization Program is Two Years Old Tomorrow; Yahoo Answers Celebrates First Birthday http://digital-scholarship.org/digitalkoans/2005/10/25/the-google-print-controversy-a-bibliography/comment-page-1/#comment-103 ResourceShelf » Google’s Launch of Library Book Digitization Program is Two Years Old Tomorrow; Yahoo Answers Celebrates First Birthday Wed, 13 Dec 2006 19:08:02 +0000 http://digital-scholarship.org/digitalkoans/?p=97#comment-103 [...] Now, to our brief chronology. For every item we listed, we could have listed 10 more. From more items, Charles W. Bailey’s “The Google Print Controversy: A Bibliography”. Links to many more articles, primary docs, etc. Kudos to Mr. Bailey for compiling this resource. [...] [...] Now, to our brief chronology. For every item we listed, we could have listed 10 more. From more items, Charles W. Bailey’s “The Google Print Controversy: A Bibliography”. Links to many more articles, primary docs, etc. Kudos to Mr. Bailey for compiling this resource. [...]

]]> By: Web Owls » Blog Archive » Google, Napster, Henry Fonda, Copyright, CopyWrong http://digital-scholarship.org/digitalkoans/2005/10/25/the-google-print-controversy-a-bibliography/comment-page-1/#comment-102 Web Owls » Blog Archive » Google, Napster, Henry Fonda, Copyright, CopyWrong Wed, 24 May 2006 12:54:00 +0000 http://digital-scholarship.org/digitalkoans/?p=97#comment-102 [...] Google’s already embroiled in copyright and content controversies with a large chunk of the print publishing industry Is this just a minor skirmish, or a harbinger of larger battles to come? [...] [...] Google’s already embroiled in copyright and content controversies with a large chunk of the print publishing industry Is this just a minor skirmish, or a harbinger of larger battles to come? [...]

]]> By: Jeffrey M. Seligson http://digital-scholarship.org/digitalkoans/2005/10/25/the-google-print-controversy-a-bibliography/comment-page-1/#comment-101 Jeffrey M. Seligson Mon, 31 Oct 2005 14:25:14 +0000 http://digital-scholarship.org/digitalkoans/?p=97#comment-101 Print publishers, like music and movie 'publishers,' are trying to maintain a business model that can no longer be maintained. The technological capabilities of millions of people cannot be pushed back. Going to lawers, the courts, including the Supreme Court, will not resolve these issues to the satisfaction of anyone. What is needed is a new business model, and whoever comes up with the one that works will start another wave of new billionares. Print publishers, like music and movie ‘publishers,’ are trying to maintain a business model that can no longer be maintained. The technological capabilities of millions of people cannot be pushed back. Going to lawers, the courts, including the Supreme Court, will not resolve these issues to the satisfaction of anyone. What is needed is a new business model, and whoever comes up with the one that works will start another wave of new billionares.

]]> By: David P. Dillard http://digital-scholarship.org/digitalkoans/2005/10/25/the-google-print-controversy-a-bibliography/comment-page-1/#comment-100 David P. Dillard Mon, 31 Oct 2005 09:17:04 +0000 http://digital-scholarship.org/digitalkoans/?p=97#comment-100 There has been an extensive group of postings regarding Google Print on Net-Gold that may be accessed at these URLs Sincerely, David Dillard Temple University (215) 204 - 4584 jwne@temple.edu Digital Divide Network There has been an extensive group of postings regarding Google Print on Net-Gold that may be accessed at these URLs

Sincerely,
David Dillard
Temple University
(215) 204 – 4584
jwne@temple.edu

Digital Divide Network

]]> By: K. Matthew Dames http://digital-scholarship.org/digitalkoans/2005/10/25/the-google-print-controversy-a-bibliography/comment-page-1/#comment-92 K. Matthew Dames Sat, 29 Oct 2005 13:33:08 +0000 http://digital-scholarship.org/digitalkoans/?p=97#comment-92 I'll submit my own take on this issue, concerning settlement. Most copyright litigation settles before a judgment on the merits. Those settlements are always confidential, thereby halting innovation. My short editorial is about why Google should not settle these lawsuits. K. Matthew Dames Executive Editor CopyCense (www.copycense.com) "Why Google Shouldn't Punt On Litigation": http://www.copycense.com/2005/10/google_shouldnt.html#more I’ll submit my own take on this issue, concerning settlement. Most copyright litigation settles before a judgment on the merits. Those settlements are always confidential, thereby halting innovation. My short editorial is about why Google should not settle these lawsuits.

K. Matthew Dames
Executive Editor
CopyCense (www.copycense.com)

“Why Google Shouldn’t Punt On Litigation”:
http://www.copycense.com/2005/10/google_shouldnt.html#more

]]> By: Charles http://digital-scholarship.org/digitalkoans/2005/10/25/the-google-print-controversy-a-bibliography/comment-page-1/#comment-93 Charles Fri, 28 Oct 2005 18:49:27 +0000 http://digital-scholarship.org/digitalkoans/?p=97#comment-93 Thanks to Siva for pointing out the omission of his works. Many of his commentary posts are part of inter-blog dialogs, some of which are included in the bibliography and have links back to his postings. I have revised the bibliography to include some of his longer posts and his NPR interview. For readers wanting more, here is a <a href="http://www.nyu.edu/cgi-bin/cgiwrap/sv24/mt-search.cgi?IncludeBlogs=2&search=%22google+print%22" rel="nofollow">search of his blog</a> for the term "Google Print." A search for just "Google" will reveal more posts, but this will obviously result in some false drops. Thanks to Siva for pointing out the omission of his works. Many of his commentary posts are part of inter-blog dialogs, some of which are included in the bibliography and have links back to his postings. I have revised the bibliography to include some of his longer posts and his NPR interview. For readers wanting more, here is a search of his blog for the term &#34;Google Print.&#34; A search for just &#34;Google&#34; will reveal more posts, but this will obviously result in some false drops.

]]> By: Siva Vaidhyanathan http://digital-scholarship.org/digitalkoans/2005/10/25/the-google-print-controversy-a-bibliography/comment-page-1/#comment-94 Siva Vaidhyanathan Thu, 27 Oct 2005 19:13:31 +0000 http://digital-scholarship.org/digitalkoans/?p=97#comment-94 I have posted dozens of pieces on this project. Please consider including them. Siva I have posted dozens of pieces on this project. Please consider including them.

Siva

]]> By: Charles http://digital-scholarship.org/digitalkoans/2005/10/25/the-google-print-controversy-a-bibliography/comment-page-1/#comment-96 Charles Thu, 27 Oct 2005 14:15:49 +0000 http://digital-scholarship.org/digitalkoans/?p=97#comment-96 Thanks to everyone who has offered suggestions. I did consider a chronological organization, but undated works presented challenges. In the past, I have used file-type labels, but, as more users migrated to higher speed connections, I decided to drop this in favor of letting interested users determine these file types from the file extensions at the end of URLs during mouse overs. <p> One of the challenges of creating any bibliography is that there are many possible ways of organizing and presenting the information, and no "right" way to do so. Unfortunately, like all authors, my time is limited, and, as much as I'd like to, I'm unable to offer multiple versions. </p><p> Like <a href="http://www.escholarlypub.com/digitalkoans/"><i>DigitalKoans</i></a> itself (and many of <a href="http://www.escholarlypub.com/">my other publications</a>), the bibliography in under a <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/">Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2.5 License</a>, so any user can create derivative works under the terms of that license. In the past, several users of my other publications have done so (for example, see the <a href="http://www.escholarlypub.com/digitalkoans/2005/08/17/searchable-version-of-the-open-access-webliography/">searchable version</a> of the "<a href="http://www.escholarlypub.com/cwb/oaw.htm">Open Access Webliography</a>"). </p><p> In private messages, I have been asked if this bibliography will be updated. I'll have to see. Among other projects, I'm working on a standalone annual update to the <a href="http://www.escholarlypub.com/oab/oab.htm"><i>Open Access Bibliography: Liberating Scholarly Literature with E-Prints and Open Access Journals</i></a> (with Adrian Ho), which is a large project, and I'm continuing to do the <i><a href="http://info.lib.uh.edu/sepb/sepb.html">Scholarly Electronic Publishing Bibliography</a></i> quarterly, <a href="http://lists.webjunction.org/currentcites/"><i>Current Cites</i></a> reviews monthly, the <a href="http://info.lib.uh.edu/sepb/sepw.htm"><i>Scholarly Electronic Publishing Weblog</i></a> biweekly, and the <i>DigitalKoan</i>'s "<a href="http://www.escholarlypub.com/digitalkoans/category/flashback-weekly-news/">Flashback</a>" posting weekly.</p> Thanks to everyone who has offered suggestions. I did consider a chronological organization, but undated works presented challenges. In the past, I have used file-type labels, but, as more users migrated to higher speed connections, I decided to drop this in favor of letting interested users determine these file types from the file extensions at the end of URLs during mouse overs.

One of the challenges of creating any bibliography is that there are many possible ways of organizing and presenting the information, and no &#34;right&#34; way to do so. Unfortunately, like all authors, my time is limited, and, as much as I’d like to, I’m unable to offer multiple versions.

Like DigitalKoans itself (and many of my other publications), the bibliography in under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2.5 License, so any user can create derivative works under the terms of that license. In the past, several users of my other publications have done so (for example, see the searchable version of the &#34;Open Access Webliography&#34;).

In private messages, I have been asked if this bibliography will be updated. I’ll have to see. Among other projects, I’m working on a standalone annual update to the Open Access Bibliography: Liberating Scholarly Literature with E-Prints and Open Access Journals (with Adrian Ho), which is a large project, and I’m continuing to do the Scholarly Electronic Publishing Bibliography quarterly, Current Cites reviews monthly, the Scholarly Electronic Publishing Weblog biweekly, and the DigitalKoan’s &#34;Flashback&#34; posting weekly.

]]> By: maurizio lana http://digital-scholarship.org/digitalkoans/2005/10/25/the-google-print-controversy-a-bibliography/comment-page-1/#comment-95 maurizio lana Wed, 26 Oct 2005 20:13:02 +0000 http://digital-scholarship.org/digitalkoans/?p=97#comment-95 in "The Google Print Controversy: A Bibliography" you give the titles in alphabetical order by author. but as this is a living matter, the only useful sorting would be by date, i think. without chronological sorting is very hard to follow the evolution of the google print matter. is it possible to have (also) the chrono sorting? with many thanks for this bibliography maurizio in “The Google Print Controversy: A Bibliography” you give the titles in alphabetical order by author.

but as this is a living matter, the only useful sorting would be by date, i think. without chronological sorting is very hard to follow the evolution of the google print matter.

is it possible to have (also) the chrono sorting?

with many thanks for this bibliography

maurizio

]]> By: Daniel Brandt http://digital-scholarship.org/digitalkoans/2005/10/25/the-google-print-controversy-a-bibliography/comment-page-1/#comment-98 Daniel Brandt Wed, 26 Oct 2005 11:59:30 +0000 http://digital-scholarship.org/digitalkoans/?p=97#comment-98 You don't really see what's happening here until you read the agreement between Google and the University of Michigan, which I obtained under Michigan's freedom of information law. http://www.google-watch.org/foia/umfoia.html You don’t really see what’s happening here until you read the
agreement between Google and the University of Michigan, which
I obtained under Michigan’s freedom of information law.

http://www.google-watch.org/foia/umfoia.html

]]> By: harry featherstone http://digital-scholarship.org/digitalkoans/2005/10/25/the-google-print-controversy-a-bibliography/comment-page-1/#comment-99 harry featherstone Tue, 25 Oct 2005 15:25:12 +0000 http://digital-scholarship.org/digitalkoans/?p=97#comment-99 This is going to the Supreme Court and will go to the Supreme Court and will go to the Supreme Court forever. This is going to the Supreme Court and will go to the Supreme Court and will go to the Supreme Court forever.

]]> By: Keith Engwall http://digital-scholarship.org/digitalkoans/2005/10/25/the-google-print-controversy-a-bibliography/comment-page-1/#comment-97 Keith Engwall Tue, 25 Oct 2005 14:59:14 +0000 http://digital-scholarship.org/digitalkoans/?p=97#comment-97 Would it be possible to indicate when a link is going to be to a document other than a web page (such as pdf's, etc.)? That would help those of us who are operating either behind a bottleneck or dialup, or on workstations that do not have the appropriate software installed. We can save the non-html documents for when we are in a more suitable environment. - Thanks. Would it be possible to indicate when a link is going to be to a document other than a web page (such as pdf’s, etc.)? That would help those of us who are operating either behind a bottleneck or dialup, or on workstations that do not have the appropriate software installed. We can save the non-html documents for when we are in a more suitable environment. – Thanks.

]]>