<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Digital Generation? Latest Breakdown of Web Users By Age Group</title>
	<atom:link href="http://digital-scholarship.org/digitalkoans/2006/03/18/digital-generation-latest-breakdown-of-web-users-by-age-group/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://digital-scholarship.org/digitalkoans/2006/03/18/digital-generation-latest-breakdown-of-web-users-by-age-group/</link>
	<description>What Is the Sound of One E-Print Downloading?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 23:22:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://digital-scholarship.org/digitalkoans/2006/03/18/digital-generation-latest-breakdown-of-web-users-by-age-group/comment-page-1/#comment-151</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2006 18:38:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-scholarship.org/digitalkoans/?p=146#comment-151</guid>
		<description>Walt:

The article doesn&#039;t indicate how the age data was gathered.  The data sources seem to be reputable, and the Wall Street Journal seems like a credible publication.  But, I agree that it is a mystery how the age data where gathered.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Walt:</p>
<p>The article doesn&#8217;t indicate how the age data was gathered.  The data sources seem to be reputable, and the Wall Street Journal seems like a credible publication.  But, I agree that it is a mystery how the age data where gathered.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: walt</title>
		<link>http://digital-scholarship.org/digitalkoans/2006/03/18/digital-generation-latest-breakdown-of-web-users-by-age-group/comment-page-1/#comment-150</link>
		<dc:creator>walt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2006 16:58:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-scholarship.org/digitalkoans/?p=146#comment-150</guid>
		<description>Charles: I wonder about that too, and what I particularly wonder is how reliable these figures are--how we &quot;know&quot; how old web users are. I can&#039;t think of more than half a dozen sites where I&#039;ve given my age, and then almost always on secure pages. 

That&#039;s what I suggested in passing by &quot;people ages 25-34 (and maybe people ages 18-24) are less inclined to make their ages known when on the internet. Probable? No. Possible? Yes. 

Also note that I could be incorrect in leaving 0-5 year olds out  of the under 17 bracket. I&#039;m pretty confident about 0-1 year olds, but there are certainly 3-5 year old kids who can read and type well enough to use the internet...that would reduce the percentages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charles: I wonder about that too, and what I particularly wonder is how reliable these figures are&#8211;how we &#8220;know&#8221; how old web users are. I can&#8217;t think of more than half a dozen sites where I&#8217;ve given my age, and then almost always on secure pages. </p>
<p>That&#8217;s what I suggested in passing by &#8220;people ages 25-34 (and maybe people ages 18-24) are less inclined to make their ages known when on the internet. Probable? No. Possible? Yes. </p>
<p>Also note that I could be incorrect in leaving 0-5 year olds out  of the under 17 bracket. I&#8217;m pretty confident about 0-1 year olds, but there are certainly 3-5 year old kids who can read and type well enough to use the internet&#8230;that would reduce the percentages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://digital-scholarship.org/digitalkoans/2006/03/18/digital-generation-latest-breakdown-of-web-users-by-age-group/comment-page-1/#comment-149</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Mar 2006 19:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-scholarship.org/digitalkoans/?p=146#comment-149</guid>
		<description>Walt:

Thanks for the additional analysis, which does put a different spin on the numbers, especially for the 17-and-under-crowd.  Still, I find it quite interesting that, in your analysis, the 18-to-24-year-olds remain dead last and the 25-to-34-year-olds remain next to last.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Walt:</p>
<p>Thanks for the additional analysis, which does put a different spin on the numbers, especially for the 17-and-under-crowd.  Still, I find it quite interesting that, in your analysis, the 18-to-24-year-olds remain dead last and the 25-to-34-year-olds remain next to last.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: walt</title>
		<link>http://digital-scholarship.org/digitalkoans/2006/03/18/digital-generation-latest-breakdown-of-web-users-by-age-group/comment-page-1/#comment-148</link>
		<dc:creator>walt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Mar 2006 17:48:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-scholarship.org/digitalkoans/?p=146#comment-148</guid>
		<description>While interesting on their own, those numbers would be more interesting as percentages. Looking at readily-available 2004 estimates (tricky, because the Census Bureau site I looked at doesn&#039;t split at 18), I see--assuming that 18 and 19 year olds account for 40% of those 15-19--and omitting the 0-5 year population as probably not representing much internet use:

1. 6-17: 74% of 41 million
2. 35-49: 65% of 65.2 million
3. 50+: 61% of 76.9 million
4. 25-34: 50% of 39.9 million
5. 18-24: 42% of 27 million

So, by this metric, traditional college-age students do appear to be dead last, but the young&#039;uns are the most avid users. Alternatively, people ages 25-34 don&#039;t make their ages known when on the internet...

Us geezers are right in the middle. But there are a whole bunch of us geezers around.

I would wonder how &quot;unique web site visitors by age group&quot; can be calculated, but that&#039;s another question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While interesting on their own, those numbers would be more interesting as percentages. Looking at readily-available 2004 estimates (tricky, because the Census Bureau site I looked at doesn&#8217;t split at 18), I see&#8211;assuming that 18 and 19 year olds account for 40% of those 15-19&#8211;and omitting the 0-5 year population as probably not representing much internet use:</p>
<p>1. 6-17: 74% of 41 million<br />
2. 35-49: 65% of 65.2 million<br />
3. 50+: 61% of 76.9 million<br />
4. 25-34: 50% of 39.9 million<br />
5. 18-24: 42% of 27 million</p>
<p>So, by this metric, traditional college-age students do appear to be dead last, but the young&#8217;uns are the most avid users. Alternatively, people ages 25-34 don&#8217;t make their ages known when on the internet&#8230;</p>
<p>Us geezers are right in the middle. But there are a whole bunch of us geezers around.</p>
<p>I would wonder how &#8220;unique web site visitors by age group&#8221; can be calculated, but that&#8217;s another question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

