Has Authorama.com "Set Free" 100 Public Domain Books from Google Book Search?
In a posting on Google Blogoscoped, Philipp Lenssen has announced that he has put up 100 public domain books from Google Book Search on Authorama.
Regarding his action, Lenssen says:
In other words, Google imposes restrictions on these books which the public domain does not impose*. I’m no lawyer, and maybe Google can print whatever guidelines they want onto those books. . . and being no lawyer, most people won’t know if the guidelines are a polite request, or legally enforceable terms**. But as a proof of concept—the concept of the public domain—I’ve now ’set free’ 100 books I downloaded from Google Book Search by republishing them on my public domain books site, Authorama. I’m not doing this out of disrespect for the Google Books program (which I think is cool, and I’ll credit Google on Authorama) but out of respect for the public domain (which I think is even cooler).
Since Lenssen has retained Google’s usage guidelines in the e-books, it’s unclear how they have been "set free," in spite of the following statement on Authorama’s Books from Google Book Search page:
The following books were downloaded from Google Book Search and are made available here as public domain. You can download, republish, mix and mash these books, for private or public, commercial or non-commercial use.
Leaving aside the above statement, Lenssen’s action appears to violate the following Google usage guideline, where Google asks that users:
Make non-commercial use of the files We designed Google Book Search for use by individuals, and we request that you use these files for personal, non-commercial purposes.
However, in the above guideline, Google uses the word "request," which suggests voluntary, rather than mandatory, compliance. Google also requests attribution and watermark retention.
Maintain attribution The Google ‘watermark’ you see on each file is essential for informing people about this project and helping them find additional materials through Google Book Search. Please do not remove it.
Note the use of the word "please."
It’s not clear how to determine if Google’s watermark remains in the Authorama files, but, given the retention of the usage guidelines, it likely does.
So, do Google’s public domain books really need to be "set free"? In its usage guidelines, Google appears to make compliance requests, not compliance requirements. Are such requests binding or not? If so, the language could be clearer. For example, here’s a possible rewording:
Make non-commercial use of the files Google Book Search is for individual use only, and its files can only be used for personal, non-commercial purposes. All other use is prohibited.
Latest posts in Copyright
- Draft Creative Commons Licences—Briefing Paper Available - November 20th, 2008
- Tennessee's Higher Education Filtering Law to Cost State Institutions Over $9.5 Million to Start - November 18th, 2008
- Copyright Clearance Center Launches Ozmo, a Commercial License Service, as Beta - November 18th, 2008
Latest posts in E-Books
- Sony's Third-Generation E-Book Reader, the PRS-700 - October 3rd, 2008
- Open Knowledge Foundation Virtual Meeting on Open Textbooks - October 2nd, 2008
- Presentations/Reports from the JISC/CNI Meeting on Transforming the User Experience - August 10th, 2008
Latest posts in Open Access
- Open Access Directory Seeks Volunteers - November 20th, 2008
- Digital Library Software: Greenstone Version 2.81 Released - November 13th, 2008
- Concord Free Press: It Really Means Free - November 12th, 2008
Latest posts in Publishing
Sandy Thatcher, Director of the Penn State University Press, to Retire
- November 21st, 2008- End of an Era: PC Magazine Drops Print - November 20th, 2008
- Federal Judge John Sprizzo Tentatively Approves Google-AAP/AG Settlement - November 18th, 2008
Latest posts in Scholarly Communication
- ARL Report: Current Models of Digital Scholarly Communication - November 10th, 2008
- Scholarly Electronic Publishing Weblog Update (11/5/08) - November 5th, 2008
- New Book from EDUCAUSE: The Tower and the Cloud - October 28th, 2008






























January 10th, 2007 at 5:26 pm
Please note:
http://blog.librarylaw.com/librarylaw/2004/07/the_public_doma.html
January 10th, 2007 at 6:22 pm
> Since Lenssen has retained Google’s usage guidelines
> in the e-books, it’s unclear how they have been
> “set free,” in spite of the following statement on
> Authorama
Charles, I agree removing the watermark + Google introduction would be better. I just didn’t know how. Brian Mingus in the comments thread to my post now says:
“… the easiest way to remove the notices for one book is to use Adobe Acrobat Professional. Just go to Document > Delete Pages > 1 to 1. That’s it.”
As far as how legally binding Google’s guidelines are, Google issued an official statement emphasizing they’re meant only as voluntary “netiquette”. Still, I doubt most users will be able to tell the one from the others — simply because most users aren’t lawyers.
January 11th, 2007 at 3:39 am
My own method of “setting free” google scans is linking to them extensively from Wikipedia articles. Think of a simple work list of any 18th or 19th century author and now compare it with a work list that has a link to each work. It makes all the difference.
These books are somewhat hidden in books.google.com - a normal google search (which is what 99% of google users may find sufficient) will not reveal them. Much the same goes for all digitization projects. My wish: If you find digitized works that you think will be useful for others, link to them wherever you can.
January 11th, 2007 at 7:32 am
Philipp:
Thanks for your reply.
Since your goal is to alert users that the works remain in the public domain because the Google guidelines are strictly voluntary, perhaps you should discuss that issue first in your Google Book Search page. That way, when users find the guidelines in the files, they won’t become confused.
Of course, this doesn’t deal with the issue of later confusion due to subsequent redistribution of files found on your page because the guidelines remain in the files.