Iowa Provost Issues Statement about Open Access MFA Theses Dust-Up
MFA students at the University of Iowa have been upset about a requirement that would make their theses available as open access documents either immediately or in two years (if they ask for an extension). A number of student blog postings have protested this requirement. Part of the problem is that MFA theses can be creative works (or other types of works, such as nonfiction works) that may have commercial potential. Peter Suber has analyzed the situation in his "Controversy over OA for Fine Arts Theses and Dissertations" posting.
The Interim Provost, Lola Lopes, has now issued a statement about the conflict.
Here's an excerpt from that statement:
For some time now our library, like most major academic research libraries, has been exploring ways to make its collections more accessible by digitizing some materials. As part of that process, there has been discussion about the possibility of making graduate student dissertations and theses available in electronic format. But any such process must be preceded by developing policies and procedures that allow authors to decide whether and when to allow distribution.
On Monday, March 17, I will begin pulling together a working group with representatives from the Graduate College, University Libraries, our several writing programs, and all other constituencies who wish to be part of the process. Under the leadership of Carl Seashore in 1922, Iowa became the first university in the United States to award MFA degrees based on creative projects. Although this has been a rocky start, I like to think that Iowa will again lead the way by developing policies and procedures that safeguard intellectual property rights while preserving materials for the use of scholars in generations to come.
Read more about it at "Iowa's 'Open Access' Policy Is Nothing but a Trojan Horse"; "Students, UI Grapple over Online Publishing"; "Thesis Policy Sparks Uproar"; "U. of Iowa Writing Students Revolt Against a Plan They Say Would Give Away Their Work on the Web"; and "Writing Students Want UI Not to Give Away Their Work."
Latest posts in Copyright
- "GBS March Madness: Paths Forward for the Google Books Settlement" - March 5th, 2010
- Unintended Consequences: 12 Years Under the DMCA - March 4th, 2010
- "The Amended Google Books Settlement is Still Exclusive" - March 3rd, 2010
Latest posts in Electronic Theses and Dissertations
- "Five Dozen Doctoral Students Chose Bits and Bytes over Ink and Paper" - January 21st, 2010
- Stanford University to Implement Electronic Dissertations - November 3rd, 2009
- ETD Self-Archiving Tools: ICE-TheOREM Final Report - October 12th, 2009
Latest posts in Institutional Repositories
- DSpace 1.6 Released - March 4th, 2010
- University of Rochester's IR+ Institutional Repository Software - March 2nd, 2010
- Presentations from Repositories and the Cloud Meeting - February 28th, 2010
Latest posts in Open Access
- SPARC: Campus-Based Open-Access Publishing Funds - March 5th, 2010
- Digital Video: Peter Suber on the Future of Open Access - March 4th, 2010
- Duke University Draft Open Access Policy - March 3rd, 2010
Latest posts in Self-Archiving
- EasyDeposit, Toolkit for Creating SWORD Deposit Interfaces, Released - February 3rd, 2010
- PEER Behavioural Research: Authors and Users vis-à-vis Journals and Repositories; Baseline Report - February 2nd, 2010
- "Citing and Reading Behaviours in High-Energy Physics. How a Community Stopped Worrying about Journals and Learned to Love Repositories" - December 6th, 2009














March 17th, 2008 at 11:40 pm
See “Academic publishing in the online era: What Will Be For-Fee And What Will Be For-Free?” by Harnad, S., Varian, H. & Parks, R. (2000) Culture Machine 2 http://cogprints.org/1700/ for a discussion of the special case of creative writing — and books in general — within the context of the movement for open access to peer-reviewed research.
Stevan Harnad
American Scientist Open Access Forum