New Report Says Less Than 50% of Publishers Permit Self-Archiving in Disciplinary Archives
A new report from the Publishing Research Consortium, Journal Authors' Rights: Perception and Reality, says that less than 10% of publishers permit self-archiving of the publisher PDF file in any repository and less than 50% permit deposit of the submitted and the accepted article version in a disciplinary archive.
Here's an excerpt:
However, when it comes to self-archiving, although 80% or more allow self- archiving to a personal or departmental website, over 60% to an institutional repository, and over 40% to a subject repository, in most cases this is only permitted for the submitted and/or accepted version; use of the final, published version for self-archiving is very much more restricted.
March 18th, 2009 at 2:34 pm
[...] New Report Says Less Than 50% of Publishers Permit Self-Archiving in Disciplinary Archives A new report from the Publishing Research Consortium, Journal Authors’ Rights: Perception and Reality, says that less than 10% of publishers permit self-archiving of the publisher PDF file in any repository and less than 50% permit deposit of the submitted and the accepted article version in a disciplinary archive. Tämän merkinnän kirjoitti Raimo Parikka, 18.3.2009 kello 22:34, luokkaan Open Access, Rinnakkaistallennus. Lisää kirjanmerkki pysyvään osoitteeseen. Seuraa keskustelua tämän merkinnän uutissyötteestä. Jätä kommentti tai trackback: Trackback-osoite. [...]