Archive for the 'Legislation and Government Regulation' Category

Department of Defense Releases Draft Plan to Establish Public Access to the Results of Federally Funded Research

Posted in Legislation and Government Regulation, Open Access, Publishing, Self-Archiving on March 19th, 2015

The Department of Defense has released a draft Plan to Establish Public Access to the Results of Federally Funded Research .

Here's an excerpt from the SPARC announcement:

It calls for all DoD-funded researchers to deposit final peer-reviewed manuscripts into the Department's "Defense Technical Information Center" (DTIC) repository. All articles will be made available to the public with no longer than a 12 embargo period. . . .

The DoD draft plan doesn't elaborate on reuse rights for articles in the DTIC database, other than to note that articles will be subject to copyright and related license terms. Articles authored by DoD employees, however, will carry a full government use license. . . .

One significant place where the DoD's draft plan differs from others released to date is in the area of compliance. The Department indicates that it plans to develop its own "compliance monitor," that will issue "certification tokens" to authors who submit articles and datasets to the DoD under the new policies. The current document doesn't provide any additional details, but the concept of tokens is an intriguing one.

Digital Scholarship | Digital Scholarship Sitemap

Be Sociable, Share!

    "Public Knowledge Applauds FCC for Delivering Strong Open Internet Rules"

    Posted in Legislation and Government Regulation, Net Neutrality on March 13th, 2015

    Public Knowledge has released "Public Knowledge Applauds FCC for Delivering Strong Open Internet Rules."

    Here's an excerpt:

    Today, the Federal Communications Commission published its Open Internet Report and Order. The order details strong rules designed to prevent Internet Service Providers from blocking, throttling or using paid prioritization to control how Americans use the internet. . . .

    An initial review shows that the order uses Title II to deliver the strong rules the Chairman promised and consumers expect. It includes simple and clear bright-line rules of no blocking, no throttling, and no paid prioritization. It prohibits unreasonable interference with consumer Internet use and strengthens transparency requirements. The Order also shows that the decision is rooted in the opinions, arguments, and legal reasoning of almost 4 million people in the extensive record gathered through this transparent process. . . .

    The Order does not create new fees and taxes for consumers. It does not create rate regulation or tariffs. The FCC was careful to forbear from 27 provisions of Title II and over 700 rules and regulations. This effort creates strong protections for consumers without harming the investment that has driven the growth of the Internet into the essential communications tool for the 21st century. It is no wonder that it has such broad support from technology companies big and small, non-tech companies, racial justice and public interest groups, some Internet Service Providers, venture capitalists and investors.

    Digital Scholarship | Digital Scholarship Sitemap

    Be Sociable, Share!

      "FCC Adopts Strong, Sustainable Rules to Protect the Open Internet"

      Posted in Legislation and Government Regulation, Net Neutrality on February 27th, 2015

      The FCC has released "FCC Adopts Strong, Sustainable Rules to Protect the Open Internet."

      Here's an excerpt:

      Today, the Commission—once and for all—enacts strong, sustainable rules, grounded in multiple sources of legal authority, to ensure that Americans reap the economic, social, and civic benefits of an Open Internet today and into the future. These new rules are guided by three principles: America's broadband networks must be fast, fair and open—principles shared by the overwhelming majority of the nearly 4 million commenters who participated in the FCC's Open Internet proceeding. Absent action by the FCC, Internet openness is at risk, as recognized by the very court that struck down the FCC's 2010 Open Internet rules last year in Verizon v. FCC. . . .

      Bright Line Rules: The first three rules ban practices that are known to harm the Open Internet:

      • No Blocking: broadband providers may not block access to legal content, applications, services, or non-harmful devices.
      • No Throttling: broadband providers may not impair or degrade lawful Internet traffic on the basis of content, applications, services, or non-harmful devices.
      • No Paid Prioritization: broadband providers may not favor some lawful Internet traffic over other lawful traffic in exchange for consideration of any kind-in other words, no "fast lanes." This rule also bans ISPs from prioritizing content and services of their affiliates.

      Digital Scholarship | Digital Scholarship Sitemap

      Be Sociable, Share!

        "AHRQ, NASA, USDA Release Plans for Public Access to Funded Research"

        Posted in Legislation and Government Regulation, Open Access, Publishing, Scholarly Journals on February 23rd, 2015

        ARL has released AHRQ, NASA, USDA Release Plans for Public Access to Funded Research.

        Here's an excerpt:

        Three US Government agencies-the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), and the US Department of Agriculture (USDA)-recently released their plans for increasing public access to federally funded research in response to the 2013 White House Office of Science & Technology Policy (OSTP) directive. The OSTP memorandum directed federal agencies with R&D budgets of $100 million or more to develop plans to make the published results of federally funded research freely available to the public within one year of publication.

        Digital Scholarship | Digital Scholarship Sitemap

        Be Sociable, Share!

          Archival Electronic Records: President Barack Obama Signs the Presidential and Federal Records Act Amendments of 2014

          Posted in Digital Curation & Digital Preservation, Legislation and Government Regulation on December 2nd, 2014

          President Barack Obama has signed H.R. 1233, the Presidential and Federal Records Act Amendments of 2014.

          Here's an excerpt from the announcement:

          Major updates to the Presidential and Federal Records Acts include:

          • Strengthening the Federal Records Act by expanding the definition of Federal records to clearly include electronic records. This is the first change to the definition of a Federal record since the enactment of the act in 1950.
          • Confirming that Federal electronic records will be transferred to the National Archives in electronic form.
          • Granting the Archivist of the United States final determination as to what constitutes a Federal record.
          • Authorizing the early transfer of permanent electronic Federal and Presidential records to the National Archives, while legal custody remains with the agency or the President.

          Digital Scholarship | "A Quarter-Century as an Open Access Publisher"

          Be Sociable, Share!

            UK Launches New Licensing Program for 91 Million Orphan Works

            Posted in Copyright, Digital Copyright Wars, Legislation and Government Regulation on November 4th, 2014

            The UK has launched a new licensing program for orphan works that will cover around 91 million works.

            Here's an excerpt from the announcement:

            A new licensing scheme launched today (29 October 2014) could give wider access to at least 91 million culturally valuable creative works-including diaries, photographs, oral history recordings and documentary films.

            These works are covered by copyright, but rights holders cannot be found by those who need to seek permission to reproduce them. Under the new scheme, a licence can be granted by the Intellectual Property Office so that these works can be reproduced on websites, in books and on TV without breaking the law, while protecting the rights of owners so they can be remunerated if they come forward.

            Digital Scholarship | "A Quarter-Century as an Open Access Publisher"

            Be Sociable, Share!

              International Trade Commission and Digital Data Regultation: "Brief of PK and EFF in ClearCorrect v. ITC"

              Posted in Internet Regulation, Legislation and Government Regulation on October 17th, 2014

              The EFF has released "Brief of PK and EFF in ClearCorrect v. ITC."

              Here's an excerpt from the announcement:

              In the sweeping and unprecedented decision below, the International Trade Commission found that its authority to regulate trade extends to pure "electronic transmission of digital data" untied to any physical medium. Generally, by statute, the Commission's jurisdiction is limited to oversight of "importation . . . of articles." However, the Commission expansively construed the term "articles" to potentially include anything "bought and sold in commerce," thereby leading to its conclusion that digital data was an article of importation. This broadly sketched statutory construction fails to indicate clearly any limiting principles on the Commission's power.

              Among other things, the Commission's decision leaves open the question of whether all transmissions of telecommunications data are within the scope of its authority.

              Digital Scholarship | "A Quarter-Century as an Open Access Publisher"

              Be Sociable, Share!

                "Codifying Collegiality: Recent Developments in Data Sharing Policy in the Life Sciences "

                Posted in Data Curation, Open Data, and Research Data Management, Legislation and Government Regulation, Publishing on September 30th, 2014

                Genevieve Pham-Kanter et al. have published "Codifying Collegiality: Recent Developments in Data Sharing Policy in the Life Sciences " in PLOS ONE.

                Over the last decade, there have been significant changes in data sharing policies and in the data sharing environment faced by life science researchers. Using data from a 2013 survey of over 1600 life science researchers, we analyze the effects of sharing policies of funding agencies and journals. We also examine the effects of new sharing infrastructure and tools (i.e., third party repositories and online supplements). We find that recently enacted data sharing policies and new sharing infrastructure and tools have had a sizable effect on encouraging data sharing. In particular, third party repositories and online supplements as well as data sharing requirements of funding agencies, particularly the NIH and the National Human Genome Research Institute, were perceived by scientists to have had a large effect on facilitating data sharing. In addition, we found a high degree of compliance with these new policies, although noncompliance resulted in few formal or informal sanctions. Despite the overall effectiveness of data sharing policies, some significant gaps remain: about one third of grant reviewers placed no weight on data sharing plans in their reviews, and a similar percentage ignored the requirements of material transfer agreements. These patterns suggest that although most of these new policies have been effective, there is still room for policy improvement.

                Digital Scholarship | "A Quarter-Century as an Open Access Publisher"

                Be Sociable, Share!

                  Page 1 of 1312345...10...Last »

                  DigitalKoans

                  DigitalKoans

                  Digital Scholarship

                  Copyright © 2005-2015 by Charles W. Bailey, Jr.

                  Creative Commons License
                  This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license.