Archive for the 'Open Access' Category

"Breaking Down Pros and Cons of Preprints in Biomedicine"

Posted in Open Access, Publishing, Scholarly Journals, Self-Archiving on May 4th, 2016

Hilda Bastian has published "Breaking Down Pros and Cons of Preprints in Biomedicine" in Absolutely Maybe.

Here's an excerpt:

The pros and cons on this are arguably different for physics and biomedicine. It might be easier to copy or fold in someone else's insights into an experiment or paper and beat them to press, so the argument goes. Perhaps this is in part a concern about losing out on a citation in a higher impact journal if your work is no longer seen as exciting. If it's a common concern, then it's a serious hurdle for preprint acceptance.

Digital Curation and Digital Preservation Works | Open Access Works | Digital Scholarship | Digital Scholarship Sitemap

Be Sociable, Share!

    "Fifty Shades of Open"

    Posted in Open Access, Open Science, Open Source Software on May 3rd, 2016

    Jeffrey Pomerantz and Robin Peek have published "Fifty Shades of Open" in First Monday.

    Here's an excerpt:

    Open source. Open access. Open society. Open knowledge. Open government. Even open food. The word "open" has been applied to a wide variety of words to create new terms, some of which make sense, and some not so much. This essay disambiguates the many meanings of the word "open" as it is used in a wide range of contexts.

    Digital Curation and Digital Preservation Works | Open Access Works | Digital Scholarship | Digital Scholarship Sitemap

    Be Sociable, Share!

      "The Mystery of Creative Commons Licenses"

      Posted in Copyright, Creative Commons/Open Licenses, Open Access, Publishing, Scholarly Journals on April 29th, 2016

      De Gruyter Open has released "The Mystery of Creative Commons Licenses" by Witold Kieńć.

      Here's an excerpt:

      While more than half of open access papers are published under the terms of a liberal Creative Commons Attribution Licence, the majority of authors of open access works seem not to accept the terms of either this or any other Creative Commons license.

      Despite the fact that the majority of journals indexed in the Directory of Open Access Journals use liberal Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) licence as a default, and that probably more than half of all articles published in open access serials are published under the terms of this licence, academic authors seem not to support liberal licensing. How is it possible? Are authors of more than 600 thousand CC-BY licensed works invisible in surveys? Or do they publish under the terms of this license against their will?

      Digital Curation and Digital Preservation Works | Open Access Works | Digital Scholarship | Digital Scholarship Sitemap

      Be Sociable, Share!

        "The Open Access Interviews: Sir Timothy Gowers, Mathematician"

        Posted in Disciplinary Archives, Open Access, Open Science, Publishing, Scholarly Journals, Self-Archiving on April 21st, 2016

        Richard Poynder has published "The Open Access Interviews: Sir Timothy Gowers, Mathematician " in Open and Shut?.

        Here's an excerpt:

        The idea of arXiv overlay journals was in the air for a long time. I think one impulse behind Discrete Analysis was the very hostile reaction from many people to the setting up of the open access journal Forum of Mathematics by Cambridge University Press, which (after a three-year free period) charges £750 per article.

        It seems that a large proportion of mathematicians are implacably opposed to article processing charges, no matter what assurances are given that authors themselves will never be expected to pay out of their own pocket, and that ability to pay will not affect the choice of which articles to publish.

        Digital Scholarship | Digital Scholarship Sitemap

        Be Sociable, Share!

          "Comparing Published Scientific Journal Articles to Their Pre-print Versions"

          Posted in Open Access, Publishing, Scholarly Journals, Self-Archiving on April 21st, 2016

          Martin Klein et al. have self-archived "Comparing Published Scientific Journal Articles to Their Pre-print Versions."

          Here's an excerpt:

          Academic publishers claim that they add value to scholarly communications by coordinating reviews and contributing and enhancing text during publication. . . . We have investigated the publishers' value proposition by conducting a comparative study of pre-print papers and their final published counterparts. This comparison had two working assumptions: 1) if the publishers' argument is valid, the text of a pre-print paper should vary measurably from its corresponding final published version, and 2) by applying standard similarity measures, we should be able to detect and quantify such differences. Our analysis revealed that the text contents of the scientific papers generally changed very little from their pre-print to final published versions.

          Digital Scholarship | Digital Scholarship Sitemap

          Be Sociable, Share!

            "Congress Wants to Turn Obama’s Open Data Actions into Law"

            Posted in Data Curation, Open Data, and Research Data Management, Legislation and Government Regulation, Open Access, Open Science on April 18th, 2016

            Representative Derek Kilmer has released "Congress Wants to Turn Obama's Open Data Actions into Law."

            Here's an excerpt:

            A new bill introduced Thursday would give a legislative basis to a number of open data initiatives already underway in the federal government under executive order.

            The Open, Public, Electronic and Necessary (OPEN) Government Data Act, introduced by Reps. Derek Kilmer, D-Wash., and Blake Farenthold, R-Texas, would build upon a number open data policies from the Obama administration that push federal agencies to make as much data as possible free for the public to use.

            A Senate version of the bill will also soon be introduced by Sens. Brian Schatz, D-HI, and Ben Sasse, R-Neb.

            Digital Scholarship | Digital Scholarship Sitemap

            Be Sociable, Share!

              "The Academic, Economic and Societal Impacts of Open Access: An Evidence-Based Review"

              Posted in Open Access, Open Science, Publishing, Scholarly Journals, Self-Archiving on April 14th, 2016

              Jonathan P. Tennant et al. have published an e-print for review of "The Academic, Economic and Societal Impacts of Open Access: An Evidence-Based Review" in F1000 Research.

              Here's an excerpt:

              This review presents published evidence of the impact of Open Access on the academy, economy and society. Overall, the evidence points to a favorable impact of OA on the scholarly literature through increased dissemination and reuse. OA has the potential to be a sustainable business venture for new and established publishers, and can provide substantial benefits to research- and development-intensive businesses, including health organisations, volunteer sectors, and technology. OA is a global issue, highlighted by inequalities beset at all levels between developing and developed nations, and largely fueled by financial inequality. Current levels of access in the developing world are insufficient and unstable, and only OA has the potential to foster the development of stable research ecosystems. While predatory publishing remains an ongoing issue, particularly in the developing world, increasing public engagement, development of OA policies, and discussion of sustainable and ethical publishing practices can remove this potential threat to OA.

              Digital Scholarship | Digital Scholarship Sitemap

              Be Sociable, Share!

                "Dramatic Growth of Open Access March 31, 2016"

                Posted in Open Access, Publishing, Scholarly Books, Scholarly Journals on April 13th, 2016

                Heather Morrison has published "Dramatic Growth of Open Access March 31, 2016 " in The Imaginary Journal of Poetic Economics.

                Here's an excerpt:

                There are now 150 publishers of peer-reviewed open access books listed in the Directory of Open Access Books, publishing more than 4,400 open access books. 620 books were published in this quarter alone, a 16% increase in just this quarter. The Directory of Open Access Journals has been adding titles at a net rate of 6 titles per day, 540 journals added this quarter for a total of over 11,000 journals.

                Digital Scholarship | Digital Scholarship Sitemap

                Be Sociable, Share!

                  Springer Will Automatically Deposit MIT-Authored Papers in DSpace@MIT

                  Posted in Open Access, Open Science, Publishing, Scholarly Journals on April 12th, 2016

                  Springer and MIT have reached an agreement that will result in Springer automatically depositing MIT-authored papers in DSpace@MIT nine months after publication.

                  Here's an excerpt from the announcement:

                  The MIT Faculty Open Access Policy, one of the first initiatives of its kind in the United States, made a bold commitment to disseminate the results of MIT research and scholarship as widely and openly as possible. Recently, the MIT Libraries affirmed this commitment by signing an innovative agreement with Springer, one of the world's largest scholarly publishers. Springer will send manuscripts of MIT-authored scholarly papers directly to the Open Access Articles Collection of DSpace@MIT, the Institute's open access repository.

                  Digital Scholarship | Digital Scholarship Sitemap

                  Be Sociable, Share!

                    "A Spiritual Successor to Aaron Swartz Is Angering Publishers All Over Again"

                    Posted in Copyright, Digital Copyright Wars, Open Access, Publishing on April 7th, 2016

                    David Kravets has published "A Spiritual Successor to Aaron Swartz Is Angering Publishers All Over Again" in Ars Technica.

                    Here's an excerpt:

                    Meet Alexandra Elbakyan, the developer of Sci-Hub, a Pirate Bay-like site for the science nerd. It's a portal that offers free and searchable access "to most publishers, especially well-known ones."

                    Digital Scholarship | Digital Scholarship Sitemap

                    Be Sociable, Share!

                      "The Costs of Open and Closed Access: Using the Finnish Research Output as an Example"

                      Posted in Open Access, Publishing, Scholarly Journals on April 7th, 2016

                      Jyrki Ilva et al. have published "The Costs of Open and Closed Access: Using the Finnish Research Output as an Example" in LIBER Quarterly.

                      Here's an excerpt:

                      As business models of Open Access publishing are still under development, the aim of our paper is to assess the statistical tools and data that the Finnish libraries currently have for comparing the costs associated with different modes of disseminating scientific publications. We will also analyse the potential costs associated with Open Access publishing models and compare them with the current cost structure of—mostly—paywalled (PW) access. . . . We will discuss the alternatives on how best to develop statistical tools to estimate the true costs of scientific publishing.

                      Digital Scholarship | Digital Scholarship Sitemap

                      Be Sociable, Share!

                        "Small Scholar-Led Scholarly Journals: Can They Survive and Thrive in an Open Access Future?"

                        Posted in Open Access, Publishing, Scholarly Journals on April 6th, 2016

                        Heather Morrison has published "Small Scholar-Led Scholarly Journals: Can They Survive and Thrive in an Open Access Future?" in Learned Publishing (open access article).

                        Here's an excerpt:

                        This article presents early results of a research project designed to further our understanding of how to ensure that small scholar-led journals can survive and thrive in a global open access knowledge commons. This phase of the research focuses on generation of ideas through interviews and focus groups with 15 participants involved in producing small scholar-led journals that either are or would like to become open access. Although a couple of journals reported that they could survive in an open access future based on existing resources, most were concerned about survival and none expressed confidence that they could thrive in an open-access future.

                        Digital Scholarship | Digital Scholarship Sitemap

                        Be Sociable, Share!

                          Page 2 of 10812345...102030...Last »

                          DigitalKoans

                          DigitalKoans

                          Digital Scholarship

                          Copyright © 2005-2016 by Charles W. Bailey, Jr.

                          Creative Commons License
                          This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license.