Archive for the 'Open Access' Category

University of Rhode Island Adopts Open Access Policy

Posted in Open Access, Publishing, Self-Archiving on March 25th, 2013

The University of Rhode Island has adopted an open access policy.

This year, Amherst College, the College of Wooster, Connecticut College, the University of North Carolina at Greensboro Library Faculty, and Wellesley College have all adopted open access policies.

(See Peter Suber's Google+ announcements of these policies.)

| Digital Scholarship | Digital Scholarship Publications Overview | Sitemap |

Be Sociable, Share!

    Entire Editorial Board of Journal of Library Administration Resigns

    Posted in Author Rights, Copyright, Open Access, Publishing, Scholarly Journals on March 25th, 2013

    There have been several reports stating that the editorial board of the Journal of Library Administration has resigned. The Journal of Library Administration is published by Taylor & Francis, which publishes a number of library and information science journals.

    Here's an excerpt from Brian Mathews's "So I'm Editing This Journal Issue and . . ." in which he quotes an e-mail from Damon Jaggars:

    "The Board believes that the licensing terms in the Taylor & Francis author agreement are too restrictive and out-of-step with the expectations of authors in the LIS community."

    "A large and growing number of current and potential authors to JLA have pushed back on the licensing terms included in the Taylor & Francis author agreement. Several authors have refused to publish with the journal under the current licensing terms."

    "Authors find the author agreement unclear and too restrictive and have repeatedly requested some form of Creative Commons license in its place."

    "After much discussion, the only alternative presented by Taylor & Francis tied a less restrictive license to a $2995 per article fee to be paid by the author. As you know, this is not a viable licensing option for authors from the LIS community who are generally not conducting research under large grants."

    "Thus, the Board came to the conclusion that it is not possible to produce a quality journal under the current licensing terms offered by Taylor & Francis and chose to collectively resign."

    The Editorial Board members are:

    Damon Jaggars (Editor)
    Kristin Antelman
    Chris Bourg
    Lisa German
    Fred M. Heath
    Paula T. Kaufman
    Deanna B. Marcum
    Sarah C. Michalak
    James G. Neal
    Ann J. Wolpert
    Makoto Nakamoto
    Stephen Town

    Read more about it at "Editorial Board Resigns from T&F Journal to Protest Restrictive Licensing," "The Journal of Library Administration," and "My Short Stint on the JLA Editorial Board."

    | Digital Scholarship | Digital Scholarship Publications Overview | Sitemap |

    Be Sociable, Share!

      Implementing an Open Data Policy: A Primer for Research Funders

      Posted in Data Curation, Open Data, and Research Data Management, Open Access, Open Science on March 22nd, 2013

      SPARC has released Implementing an Open Data Policy: A Primer for Research Funders.

      Here's an excerpt from the announcement:

      This primer addresses key issues that these organizations encounter when considering the adoption and implementation of an open data policy. The guide covers big-picture topics such as how to decide on the range of activities an open data policy should cover. It also delves into areas of very specific concern, such as options for where data can be deposited, and how privacy and other concerns can be managed.

      | Digital Scholarship | Digital Scholarship Publications Overview | Sitemap |

      Be Sociable, Share!

        "A Case for the Public Domain"

        Posted in Copyright, Open Access, Public Domain on February 18th, 2013

        Clark D. Asay has self-archived "A Case for the Public Domain" in SSRN.

        Here's an excerpt:

        Over the past several decades open license movements have proven highly successful in the software and content worlds. . . . This Article argues that this IP-based approach, while perhaps helpful in the beginning, is no longer necessary and in fact prevents the movements from reaching their full potential. The IP-based approach has this effect by causing significant transaction costs without offsetting benefits, resulting in a tragedy of the anti-commons. The IP-based approach also creates the risk of IP trolls in the future, especially in the copyright sphere. . . . The Article then examines the benefits of a public domain approach and argues that such an approach would reduce the wasteful transaction costs, limit the possibility of IP trolls, still satisfy the purposes of those that contribute materials under open licenses, and better align with the normative tenets of such movements. To conclude, the Article assesses the merits of a "Public Domain Act" that would help address obstacles that currently exist in dedicating materials to the public domain and posits some theoretical implications relating to innovation based on the experiences of the open license movements and the arguments of this Article.

        | Digital Scholarship's Digital/Print Books | Digital Scholarship |

        Be Sociable, Share!

          "SSRN and Law Journals—Rivals or Allies?"

          Posted in Digital Repositories, Disciplinary Archives, Open Access, Publishing, Self-Archiving on February 15th, 2013

          Ian Ramsay has self-archived "SSRN and Law Journals—Rivals or Allies?" in SSRN.

          Here's an excerpt:

          The author identifies and evaluates the respective merits of publication in law journals and publication on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN)—the largest open access repository for legal scholarship. This evaluation leads to the conclusion that at this stage of the evolution of law journals and SSRN, there are advantages in authors publishing both in journals and on SSRN. However, publication on SSRN can have particular advantages for authors in smaller countries.

          | Reviews of Digital Scholarship Publications | Digital Scholarship |

          Be Sociable, Share!

            De Gruyter Adopts Creative Commons CC BY-NC-ND License for Open Access Content

            Posted in Open Access, Publishing on February 15th, 2013

            De Gruyter has adopted the Creative Commons CC BY-NC-ND license for its open access content.

            Here's an excerpt from the press release:

            Effective immediately De Gruyter and Versita will be publishing all Open Access content under the uniform application of Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND. This means that publications may be copied, disseminated, and otherwise made public by users under the following conditions:

            • The name of the author/copyright owner must be mentioned in the manner requested by the author/copyright owner.
            • The publication and its content may not be used in its Open Access format for commercial purposes.
            • The publication and its content may not be edited, modified, or otherwise changed. . . .

            In 2012 De Gruyter and Versita published over 10,000 Open Access articles in some 300 journals. Since 2009 a large number of books and book chapters have also been published under the Open Access standard.

            | A Look Back at 22 Years as an Open Access Publisher | Digital Scholarship |

            Be Sociable, Share!

              Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Bill Introduced

              Posted in Legislation and Government Regulation, Open Access on February 14th, 2013

              The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research bill has been introduced in the House and the Senate.

              Here's an excerpt from Peter Suber's analysis how the bill compares to the Federal Research Public Access Act :

              Here's how FASTR differs from FRPAA:

              • FASTR contains a provision on coordinating agency policies (4.a 2): "To the extent practicable, Federal agencies required to develop a policy…shall follow common procedures for the collection and depositing of research papers." This will reduce the burden on universities that need to comply with procedures at all the covered agencies, and should have no detrimental effect on OA. Indeed, it should improve compliance with agency OA policies.
              • FASTR contains three provisions calling for libre OA or open licensing:
                • FASTR includes a new "finding" in its preamble (2.3): "the United States has a substantial interest in maximizing the impact and utility of the research it funds by enabling a wide range of reuses of the peer-reviewed literature that reports the results of such research, including by enabling computational analysis by state-of-the-art technologies."
                • FASTR includes a formatting and licensing provision (4.b.5): the versions deposited in repositories and made OA shall be distributed "in formats and under terms that enable productive reuse, including computational analysis by state-of-the-art technologies."
                • FASTR requires that the annual report from each covered agency include a statement from the agency on "whether the terms of use applicable to such research papers are effective in enabling productive reuse and computational analysis by state-of-the-art technologies" (4.f.2.B.i) and the results of the agency's "examination of whether such research papers should include a royalty-free copyright license that is available to the public and that permits the reuse of those research papers, on the condition that attribution is given to the author or authors of the research and any others designated by the copyright owner" (4.f.2.B.ii).

              The Alliance for Taxpayer Access has issued a call to action to support the bill.

              | Transforming Scholarly Publishing through Open Access: A Bibliography (paperback, PDF file, and XHTML website; over 1,100 entries) | Digital Scholarship |

              Be Sociable, Share!

                Open Access: Presentations from the Academy of Social Sciences’ Implementing Finch Conference Published

                Posted in Open Access, Publishing, Scholarly Journals, Self-Archiving on February 8th, 2013

                The Academy of Social Sciences has released a Professional Briefings issue that contains the presentations from its two-day Implementing Finch conference.

                Here's an excerpt:

                Moving to the recommendations, Dame Janet wished to correct some misunderstandings. The main recommendation was for a mixed economy including both the 'author pays' and subscription models of publishing. The report did not recommend a rapid move to Gold open access ('author pays') and anticipated a mixed economy for the foreseeable future. However the report did recommend that the policy direction should be set towards Gold open access and envisaged the balance between the two models of publishing would shift over time.

                | Transforming Scholarly Publishing through Open Access: A Bibliography (paperback, PDF file, and XHTML website; over 1,100 entries) | Digital Scholarship |

                Be Sociable, Share!

                  "Open Access, Library and Publisher Competition, and the Evolution of General Commerce"

                  Posted in Libraries, Licenses, Open Access, Publishing, Scholarly Journals on February 6th, 2013

                  Andrew Odlyzko has self-archived "Open Access, Library and Publisher Competition, and the Evolution of General Commerce."

                  Here's an excerpt:

                  Discussions of the economics of scholarly communication are usually devoted to Open Access, rising journal prices, publisher profits, and boycotts. That ignores what seems a much more important development in this market. Publishers, through the oft-reviled "Big Deal" packages, are providing much greater and more egalitarian access to the journal literature, an approximation to true Open Access. In the process they are also marginalizing libraries, and obtaining a greater share of the resources going into scholarly communication. This is enabling a continuation of publisher profits as well as of what for decades has been called "unsustainable journal price escalation." It is also inhibiting the spread of Open Access, and potentially leading to an oligopoly of publishers controlling distribution through large-scale licensing.

                  | Transforming Scholarly Publishing through Open Access: A Bibliography (paperback, PDF file, and XHTML website; over 1,100 entries) | Digital Scholarship |

                  Be Sociable, Share!

                    "Open-Sourcing the Global Academy: Aaron Swartz’s Legacy"

                    Posted in Copyright, Digital Copyright Wars, Open Access, Publishing on January 30th, 2013

                    Rebecca Gould has self-archived "Open-Sourcing the Global Academy: Aaron Swartz's Legacy" in SSRN.

                    Here's an excerpt:

                    This essay examines Swartz's Open Access vision, and traces the challenges he faced in carrying out his dream. Arguing that Open Access is the future of scholarship in the digital age, I outline concrete strategies for bringing Swartz's dream to fruition.

                    | Scholarly Electronic Publishing Weblog | Digital Scholarship |

                    Be Sociable, Share!

                      "Scholarly Communications and the Role of the Liberal Arts College Library"

                      Posted in Open Access, Scholarly Communication on January 29th, 2013

                      Diane J. Graves has self-archived "Scholarly Communications and the Role of the Liberal Arts College Library" in Digital Commons @ Trinity.

                      Here's an excerpt:

                      One of the most puzzling aspects of the entire conversation around scholarly communication—the impact of existing models, the search for alternatives, the need for advocacy—is the assumption that it is the purview of Carnegie Research I institutions first and foremost, followed by those institutions with robust doctoral programs. The corollary is that small academic libraries—college libraries at liberal arts institutions, in particular—are not significant players in the conversation, nor should they be. Many in the academy, including those who work at such institutions, tend to think that the liberal arts college environment is too small to have a significant voice in the debate over alternatives to traditional models. . . .

                      Scenarios that look ahead to the next decade and beyond would be wise to look closely at the impact the small college library can have on the very lifeblood and purpose of libraries: the collection and dissemination of scholarly content.

                      | Transforming Scholarly Publishing through Open Access: A Bibliography (paperback, PDF file, and XHTML website; over 1,100 entries) | Digital Scholarship |

                      Be Sociable, Share!

                        "Academic Administrator Influence on Institutional Commitment to Open Access of Scholarly Research"

                        Posted in Digital Repositories, Institutional Repositories, Open Access on January 28th, 2013

                        Thomas L. Reinsfelder has self-archived his "Academic Administrator Influence on Institutional Commitment to Open Access of Scholarly Research" dissertation in Indiana University of Pennsylvania DSpace

                        Here's an excerpt:

                        This quantitative study investigated the interrelationships among faculty researchers, publishers, librarians, and academic administrators when dealing with the open access of scholarly research. This study sought to identify the nature of any relationship between the perceived attitudes and actions of academic administrators and an institution's commitment to open access as reported by library directors. A survey research design was used to collect data based on perceptions of library directors at four year colleges and universities in the United States. Results of this study show that as academic administrator attention to open access increases so do the open access activities of faculty and librarians. Information presented may benefit members in each stakeholder group by allowing them to better position their organizations for future success in a complex environment. This study may also benefit advocates of open access who wish to expand services and other initiatives that encourage the greater accessibility of scholarly work.

                        | Institutional Repository and ETD Bibliography 2011 (paperback and PDF file; over 600 entries) | Digital Scholarship |

                        Be Sociable, Share!

                          Page 21 of 100« First...10...1920212223...304050...Last »

                          DigitalKoans

                          DigitalKoans

                          Digital Scholarship

                          Copyright © 2005-2015 by Charles W. Bailey, Jr.

                          Creative Commons License
                          This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license.