Archive for the 'Open Access' Category

"Beyond Beall’s List: Better Understanding Predatory Publishers"

Posted in Open Access, Publishing, Scholarly Journals on March 10th, 2015

Monica Berger and Jill Cirasella have published "Beyond Beall's List: Better Understanding Predatory Publishers" in College & Research Libraries News.

Here's an excerpt:

Although predatory publishers predate OA, their recent explosion was expedited by the emergence and success of fee-charging OA journals. No matter how strong our urge to support and defend OA, librarians cannot deny the profusion of predators in the OA arena; John Bohannon's recent "sting" made abundantly clear (despite methodological flaws) that there are many bad actors. Rather, we should seek to understand their methods, track their evolution, and communicate their characteristics to our patrons.

Digital Scholarship | Digital Scholarship Sitemap

Be Sociable, Share!

    "The OA Interviews: Alison Mudditt, Director, University of California Press"

    Posted in Open Access, Publishing, Scholarly Books, Scholarly Journals, University Presses on March 9th, 2015

    Richard Poynder has published "The OA Interviews: Alison Mudditt, Director, University of California Press" in Open and Shut? in which Mudditt discusses the UC Press' Collabra and Luminos open access programs.

    Here's an excerpt:

    Collabra's model speaks to publishers, libraries, funders, and researchers who are seeking more cost transparency and greater recognition of the critical role that the academic and scientific community plays in journal publishing. In our model, the people who do the fundamental work of peer-review are recognized for this and are able to decide where to place that value.

    Digital Scholarship | Digital Scholarship Sitemap

    Be Sociable, Share!

      "Flipping, not Flopping: Converting Subscription Journals to Open Access"

      Posted in Open Access, Publishing, Scholarly Journals on March 5th, 2015

      Alice Meadows has published "Flipping, not Flopping: Converting Subscription Journals to Open Access" in The Scholarly Kitchen .

      Here's an excerpt:

      The question of whether—and, if so, when and how—to 'flip' a traditional, subscription-based journal to open access (OA) is one that comes up time and again in meetings with our society partners. It's also something that funders sometimes like to suggest as a quick route to a more open world—"Why not just convert all your journals to OA?" they ask.

      Digital Scholarship | Digital Scholarship Sitemap

      Be Sociable, Share!

        Canadian Tri-Agency Open Access Policy

        Posted in Open Access on March 3rd, 2015

        The Canadian Institutes of Health Research, the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, and the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada have adopted a harmonized open access policy.

        Here's an excerpt from the FAQ:

        The Tri-Agency Open Access Policy on Publications requires that peer-reviewed journal publications resulting from Tri-Agency (NSERC, SSHRC or CIHR) grants be freely accessible online within 12 months of publication.

        Grant recipients may comply with the policy through one of the following routes:

        • Grant recipients archive the final peer-reviewed full-text manuscript in an online repository where it will be freely accessible within 12 months (e.g., institutional repository or discipline-based repository). It is the responsibility of the grant recipient to determine which publishers allow authors to retain copyright and/or allow authors to archive journal publications in accordance with funding agency policies.
        • Grant recipients can publish in a journal that offers open access or that offers open access on its website within 12 months.

        Digital Scholarship | Digital Scholarship Sitemap

        Be Sociable, Share!

          "The Economics of Open Access"

          Posted in Open Access, Publishing on March 3rd, 2015

          Walt Crawford as published "The Economics of Open Access" in Cites & Insights: Crawford at Large.

          Here's an excerpt:

          This essay is primarily about open access, but strays into journal publishing in general. As usual, it's a combination of resources (cites) and commentary (insights), divided into ten overlapping segments. I believe the mèlange will be informative and useful, although I'm certain it won't provide pat answers to most questions, because such answers don't exist.

          Digital Scholarship | Digital Scholarship Sitemap

          Be Sociable, Share!

            "AHRQ, NASA, USDA Release Plans for Public Access to Funded Research"

            Posted in Legislation and Government Regulation, Open Access, Publishing, Scholarly Journals on February 23rd, 2015

            ARL has released AHRQ, NASA, USDA Release Plans for Public Access to Funded Research.

            Here's an excerpt:

            Three US Government agencies-the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), and the US Department of Agriculture (USDA)-recently released their plans for increasing public access to federally funded research in response to the 2013 White House Office of Science & Technology Policy (OSTP) directive. The OSTP memorandum directed federal agencies with R&D budgets of $100 million or more to develop plans to make the published results of federally funded research freely available to the public within one year of publication.

            Digital Scholarship | Digital Scholarship Sitemap

            Be Sociable, Share!

              Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Adopts Open Access Mandate

              Posted in Open Access on February 10th, 2015

              The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, an agency within the United States Department of Health and Human Services, has adopted an open access mandate.

              Here's an excerpt:

              For scholarly publications, the AHRQ Public Access Policy will require that authors submit the final peer-reviewed accepted journal manuscripts to PubMed Central (PMC). In lieu of the final peer-reviewed manuscript, AHRQ will accept the final published article, provided the awardee can ensure AHRQ has the rights to make the published version public. AHRQ's Public Access Policy is subject to law; Agency mission; resource constraints; U.S. national, homeland, and economic security; and the objectives listed in the OSTP directive.

              To the extent feasible and consistent with applicable law and policy; Agency mission; resource constraints; U.S. national, homeland, and economic security; and the objectives listed below, digitally formatted scientific data resulting from unclassified research supported wholly or in part by Federal funding should be stored and publicly accessible to search, retrieve, and analyze. For sharing of data in digital format, all AHRQ-funded researchers will be required to include a data management plan for sharing final research data in digital format, or state why data sharing is not possible.

              Peter Suber has critiqued the mandate.

              Digital Scholarship | Digital Scholarship Sitemap

              Be Sociable, Share!

                "Open Access Article Processing Charges: DOAJ Survey May 2014"

                Posted in Open Access, Publishing, Scholarly Journals on February 10th, 2015

                Heather Morrison et al. have published "Open Access Article Processing Charges: DOAJ Survey May 2014" in Publications.

                Here's an excerpt:

                As of May 2014, the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) listed close to ten thousand fully open access, peer reviewed, scholarly journals. Most of these journals do not charge article processing charges (APCs). This article reports the results of a survey of the 2567 journals, or 26% of journals listed in DOAJ, that do have APCs based on a sample of 1432 of these journals. Results indicate a volatile sector that would make future APCs difficult to predict for budgeting purposes. DOAJ and publisher title lists often did not closely match. A number of journals were found on examination not to have APCs. A wide range of publication costs was found for every publisher type. The average (mean) APC of $964 contrasts with a mode of $0. At least 61% of publishers using APCs are commercial in nature, while many publishers are of unknown types. The vast majority of journals charging APCs (80%) were found to offer one or more variations on pricing, such as discounts for authors from mid to low income countries, differential pricing based on article type, institutional or society membership, and/or optional charges for extras such as English language editing services or fast track of articles. The complexity and volatility of this publishing landscape is discussed.

                Digital Scholarship | Digital Scholarship Sitemap

                Be Sociable, Share!

                  COAR Roadmap: Future Directions for Repository Interoperability

                  Posted in Digital Repositories, Institutional Repositories, Open Access, Reports and White Papers on February 6th, 2015

                  COAR has released COAR Roadmap: Future Directions for Repository Interoperability.

                  Here's an excerpt:

                  Scholarly communication is undergoing fundamental changes, in particular with new requirements for open access to research outputs, new forms of peer-review, and alternative methods for measuring impact. In parallel, technical developments, especially in communication and interface technologies facilitate bi-directional data exchange across related applications and systems. The aim of this roadmap is to identify important trends and their associated action points in order for the repository community to determine priorities for further investments in interoperability.

                  Digital Scholarship | Digital Scholarship Sitemap

                  Be Sociable, Share!

                    Managing Open Access Publication: A System Specification

                    Posted in Open Access, Publishing, Research Libraries on February 6th, 2015

                    JISC Monitor has released Managing Open Access Publication: A System Specification.

                    Here's an excerpt:

                    The purpose of this document is to provide a specification for a system to help UK HE institutions manage administrative data in relation to the publication of open access Academic Outputs. The document is intended to:

                    • Describe the scope of such a system and the workflows it should support
                    • Describe an appropriate data model given the scope and workflows
                    • Provide illustrative wireframes for a user interface (UI) to such a system

                    Digital Scholarship | Digital Scholarship Sitemap

                    Be Sociable, Share!

                      "One More Chunk of DOAJ"

                      Posted in Open Access, Publishing, Scholarly Journals on February 5th, 2015

                      Walt Crawford has published "One More Chunk of DOAJ" in Cites & Insights Crawford at Large.

                      Here's an excerpt:

                      Because there will be a published concise version of all this stuff—out this summer from ALA's Library Technology Reports, working title "Idealism and Opportunism: The State of Open Access Journals"—I went through 2,200-odd additional DOAJ journals with English as one of the language options (but not the first one), and was able to add 1,507 more entries to my DOAJ master spreadsheet, which now includes 6,490 journals qualifying for full analysis and 811 that don't. This essay offers some summary information on the 1,507 added journals and some overall notes on the full DOAJ set-including some new and replacement tables (there may be errors in tables 2.66 b and c and 2.67 b and c in earlier issues).

                      Digital Scholarship | Digital Scholarship Sitemap

                      Be Sociable, Share!

                        "Who Should We Trust?"

                        Posted in Open Access, Publishing on February 2nd, 2015

                        Kevin Smith has published "Who Should We Trust?" in Scholarly Communications @ Duke.

                        Here's an excerpt:

                        It is not that we exactly trust commercial publishers, nor do we exactly distrust them. We may recognize that the values and goals of the commercial publishing business are different from, and even in conflict with, the best interests of scholarly authors and of scholarship itself. Perfectly nice people, working to advance their own interests as best they can, come in to conflict as the conditions for research and teaching change. And a real ambivalence is created because of how interwoven the parts of the academic enterprise are. More than just inertia is a work; important aspects of the academic enterprise remain interlocked with traditional forms of publication.

                        Digital Scholarship | Digital Scholarship Sitemap

                        Be Sociable, Share!

                          Page 5 of 100« First...34567...102030...Last »

                          DigitalKoans

                          DigitalKoans

                          Digital Scholarship

                          Copyright © 2005-2015 by Charles W. Bailey, Jr.

                          Creative Commons License
                          This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license.