Update: See the Google Book Search Bibliography, Version 2 for the latest bibliography.
This bibliography presents selected English-language electronic works about Google Print that are freely available on the Internet. It has a special focus on the legal issues associated with this project. Page numbers for print/electronic publications are not included unless they are mentioned in the electronic version.
Association of American Publishers. "Google Library Project Raises Serious Questions for Publishers and Authors."
Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers. "Google Print for Libraries—ALPSP Position Statement."
Authors Guild. "Authors Guild Sues Google, Citing 'Massive Copyright Infringement'."
Band. Jonathan. "The Google Print Library Project: A Copyright Analysis." ARL: A Bimonthly Report on Research Library Issues and Actions from ARL, CNI, and SPARC, no. 242 (2005): 6-9.
Banks, Marcus A. "The Excitement of Google Scholar, the Worry of Google Print." Biomedical Digital Libraries 2 (Article 2 2005).
Battelle, John. "The AAP/Google Lawsuit: Much More At Stake ." John Battelle's Searchblog, 20 October 2005.
Blankenhorn, Dana. "Economic Lesson of Google Print." Moore's Lore, 21 October 2005.
Chafkin, Max. "Google Scrambles to Defend 'Google Print for Libraries' Initiative." The Book Standard, 21 October 2005.
Coleman, Mary Sue. "Riches We Must Share . . ." The Washington Post, 22 October 2005, A21.
Crawford, Susan. "Why Google Is Right." Susan Crawford Blog, 21 September 2005.
Drummond, David. "Why We Believe in Google Print." Google Blog, 19 October 2005.
DW staff. "German Publishers Warm to Google Library." Deutsche Welle, 20 October 2005.
Felten, Edward W. "Google Print, Damages and Incentives." Freedom to Tinker, 23 September 2005.
Finkelstein, Seth. "Google Print Is Not Copyright's Enemy-Of-My-Enemy-Is-My-Friend." Infothought, 23 September 2005.
Google. "Google Checks Out Library Books."
———. "Google Print."
———. "Information for Publishers about the Library Project."
Google, and University Library, University of Michigan. "Cooperative Agreement."
Graham, Jefferson. "Google Print Project Inspires Fans, Fears." USA Today, 17 October 2005.
Helm, Burt. "For Google, Another Stormy Chapter." BusinessWeek, 22 September 2005.
———. "A Google Project Pains Publishers." BusinessWeek, 23 May 2005.
———. "Google's Escalating Book Battle." BusinessWeek, 20 October 2005.
———. "Google's Plan Doesn't Scan." BusinessWeek, 12 August 2005.
———. "A New Page in Google's Books Fight." BusinessWeek, 22 June 2005.
Hof, Rob. "Lawsuit Against Google Print: The End of the Internet?" The Tech Beat, 21 October 2005.
Keegan, Victor. "A Bookworm's Delight." The Guardian, 21 October 2005.
Lavoie, Brian, Lynn Silipigni Connaway, and Lorcan Dempsey. "Anatomy of Aggregate Collections: The Example of Google Print for Libraries." D-Lib Magazine 11, no. 9 (2005).
Lessig, Lawrence. "Google Sued." Lessig Blog, 22 September 2005.
Marco, Meghann. "So, My Publisher Is Sueing Google. . ." MeghannMarco.com, 19 October 2005.
Markoff, John, and Edward Wyatt. "Google Is Adding Major Libraries to Its Database." The New York Times, 14 December 2004.
Mathes, Adam. "The Point of Google Print." Google Blog, 19 October 2005.
O'Reilly, Tim. "Google Library vs. Publishers." O'Reilly Radar, 13 August 2005.
Patry, William. "Google Revisited." The Patry Copyright Blog, 23 September 2005.
______. "Google, the Second Suit and Second Copy." The Patry Copyright Blog, 21 October 2005.
Petit, C. E. "Author's Guild v. Google: A Skeptical Analysis." Scrivener's Error: Warped Weft, 2005.
Pickering, Bobby. "Google Clarifies Print Differences in Europe." Information World Review, 18 October 2005.
Quilter, Laura. "Google & Not-for-Profit Libraries." Derivative Work, 13 August 2005.
Quint, Barbara. "CORRECTIONS: Google Print Not All I Said It Was." Information Today NewsBreaks & the Weekly News Digest, 29 August 2005.
———. "Google and Research Libraries Launch Massive Digitization Project." Information Today NewsBreaks & the Weekly News Digest, 20 December 2004.
———. "Google Library Project Hit by Copyright Challenge from University Presses." Information Today NewsBreaks & the Weekly News Digest, 31 May 2005.
———. "Google Slows Library Project to Accommodate Publishers." Information Today NewsBreaks & the Weekly News Digest, 15 August 2005.
———. "Google's Library Project: Questions, Questions, Questions." Information Today NewsBreaks & the Weekly News Digest, 27 December 2004.
———. "The Other Shoe Drops: Google Print Sued for Copyright Violation." Information Today NewsBreaks & the Weekly News Digest, 3 October 2005.
Raff, Andrew. "Google, Publishers, Copies and 'Being Evil'." IPTAblog, 21 September 2005.
Slater, Derek. "Google Print Commentary Round-Up." A Copyfighter's Musings, 20 October 2005.
Smith, Adam M. "Making Books Easier to Find." Google Blog, 11 August 2005.
Suber, Peter. "Does Google Library Violate Copyright?" SPARC Open Access Newsletter, no. 90 (2005).
Sullivan, Danny. "Forget Google Print Copyright Infringement; Search Engines Already Infringe." Search Engine Watch, 25 May 2005.
_______. "Indexing Versus Caching & How Google Print Doesn't Reprint." Search Engine Watch, 21 October 2005.
Taylor, Nick. ". . . But Not at Writers' Expense." The Washington Post, 22 October 2005, A21.
Thompson, Bill. "Defending Google's Licence to Print." BBC News, 10 October 2005.
University Library, University of Michigan. "UM Library/Google Digitization Partnership FAQ, August 2005."
Vaidhyanathan, Siva. "Google Avoids Copyright Meltdown." SIVACRACY.NET: Opinions, Rants, and Obsessions of Siva Vaidhyanathan and his Friends and Family, 12 August 2005.
_______. "On the Essense of Libraries and Fair Use." SIVACRACY.NET: Opinions, Rants, and Obsessions of Siva Vaidhyanathan and his Friends and Family, 18 August 2005.
_______. "'Steal This Book'." On the Media, 30 September 2005.
"Why I Think Google's Library Plan was Out of Bounds." SIVACRACY.NET: Opinions, Rants, and Obsessions of Siva Vaidhyanathan and his Friends and Family, 13 August 2005.
von Lohmann, Fred. "Authors Guild Sues Google." Deep Links, 20 September 2005.
Wentworth, Donna. "Google Print Is as Google Print Does." Copyfight, 15 August 2005.
Wilkin, John P., and Reginald Carr. "Google's Library Digitization Project: Reports from Michigan and Oxford."
Wojcicki, Susan. "Google Print and the Authors Guild." Google Blog, 20 September 2005.
Wu,Tim. "Leggo My Ego." Slate, 17 October 2005.
Wyatt, Edward. "Google Opens 8 Sites in Europe, Widening Its Book Search Effort." The New York Times, 18 October 2005.
Would it be possible to indicate when a link is going to be to a document other than a web page (such as pdf’s, etc.)? That would help those of us who are operating either behind a bottleneck or dialup, or on workstations that do not have the appropriate software installed. We can save the non-html documents for when we are in a more suitable environment. – Thanks.
This is going to the Supreme Court and will go to the Supreme Court and will go to the Supreme Court forever.
You don’t really see what’s happening here until you read the
agreement between Google and the University of Michigan, which
I obtained under Michigan’s freedom of information law.
http://www.google-watch.org/foia/umfoia.html
in “The Google Print Controversy: A Bibliography” you give the titles in alphabetical order by author.
but as this is a living matter, the only useful sorting would be by date, i think. without chronological sorting is very hard to follow the evolution of the google print matter.
is it possible to have (also) the chrono sorting?
with many thanks for this bibliography
maurizio
Thanks to everyone who has offered suggestions. I did consider a chronological organization, but undated works presented challenges. In the past, I have used file-type labels, but, as more users migrated to higher speed connections, I decided to drop this in favor of letting interested users determine these file types from the file extensions at the end of URLs during mouse overs.
One of the challenges of creating any bibliography is that there are many possible ways of organizing and presenting the information, and no "right" way to do so. Unfortunately, like all authors, my time is limited, and, as much as I’d like to, I’m unable to offer multiple versions.
Like DigitalKoans itself (and many of my other publications), the bibliography in under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2.5 License, so any user can create derivative works under the terms of that license. In the past, several users of my other publications have done so (for example, see the searchable version of the "Open Access Webliography").
In private messages, I have been asked if this bibliography will be updated. I’ll have to see. Among other projects, I’m working on a standalone annual update to the Open Access Bibliography: Liberating Scholarly Literature with E-Prints and Open Access Journals (with Adrian Ho), which is a large project, and I’m continuing to do the Scholarly Electronic Publishing Bibliography quarterly, Current Cites reviews monthly, the Scholarly Electronic Publishing Weblog biweekly, and the DigitalKoan‘s "Flashback" posting weekly.
I have posted dozens of pieces on this project. Please consider including them.
Siva
Thanks to Siva for pointing out the omission of his works. Many of his commentary posts are part of inter-blog dialogs, some of which are included in the bibliography and have links back to his postings. I have revised the bibliography to include some of his longer posts and his NPR interview. For readers wanting more, here is a search of his blog for the term "Google Print." A search for just "Google" will reveal more posts, but this will obviously result in some false drops.
I’ll submit my own take on this issue, concerning settlement. Most copyright litigation settles before a judgment on the merits. Those settlements are always confidential, thereby halting innovation. My short editorial is about why Google should not settle these lawsuits.
K. Matthew Dames
Executive Editor
CopyCense (www.copycense.com)
“Why Google Shouldn’t Punt On Litigation”:
http://www.copycense.com/2005/10/google_shouldnt.html#more
There has been an extensive group of postings regarding Google Print on Net-Gold that may be accessed at these URLs
Sincerely,
David Dillard
Temple University
(215) 204 – 4584
jwne@temple.edu
Digital Divide Network
Print publishers, like music and movie ‘publishers,’ are trying to maintain a business model that can no longer be maintained. The technological capabilities of millions of people cannot be pushed back. Going to lawers, the courts, including the Supreme Court, will not resolve these issues to the satisfaction of anyone. What is needed is a new business model, and whoever comes up with the one that works will start another wave of new billionares.