Archive for the 'Open Access' Category

"Open Access Article Processing Charges: DOAJ Survey May 2014"

Posted in Open Access, Publishing, Scholarly Journals on February 10th, 2015

Heather Morrison et al. have published "Open Access Article Processing Charges: DOAJ Survey May 2014" in Publications.

Here's an excerpt:

As of May 2014, the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) listed close to ten thousand fully open access, peer reviewed, scholarly journals. Most of these journals do not charge article processing charges (APCs). This article reports the results of a survey of the 2567 journals, or 26% of journals listed in DOAJ, that do have APCs based on a sample of 1432 of these journals. Results indicate a volatile sector that would make future APCs difficult to predict for budgeting purposes. DOAJ and publisher title lists often did not closely match. A number of journals were found on examination not to have APCs. A wide range of publication costs was found for every publisher type. The average (mean) APC of $964 contrasts with a mode of $0. At least 61% of publishers using APCs are commercial in nature, while many publishers are of unknown types. The vast majority of journals charging APCs (80%) were found to offer one or more variations on pricing, such as discounts for authors from mid to low income countries, differential pricing based on article type, institutional or society membership, and/or optional charges for extras such as English language editing services or fast track of articles. The complexity and volatility of this publishing landscape is discussed.

Digital Scholarship | Digital Scholarship Sitemap

Be Sociable, Share!

    COAR Roadmap: Future Directions for Repository Interoperability

    Posted in Digital Repositories, Institutional Repositories, Open Access, Reports and White Papers on February 6th, 2015

    COAR has released COAR Roadmap: Future Directions for Repository Interoperability.

    Here's an excerpt:

    Scholarly communication is undergoing fundamental changes, in particular with new requirements for open access to research outputs, new forms of peer-review, and alternative methods for measuring impact. In parallel, technical developments, especially in communication and interface technologies facilitate bi-directional data exchange across related applications and systems. The aim of this roadmap is to identify important trends and their associated action points in order for the repository community to determine priorities for further investments in interoperability.

    Digital Scholarship | Digital Scholarship Sitemap

    Be Sociable, Share!

      Managing Open Access Publication: A System Specification

      Posted in Open Access, Publishing, Research Libraries on February 6th, 2015

      JISC Monitor has released Managing Open Access Publication: A System Specification.

      Here's an excerpt:

      The purpose of this document is to provide a specification for a system to help UK HE institutions manage administrative data in relation to the publication of open access Academic Outputs. The document is intended to:

      • Describe the scope of such a system and the workflows it should support
      • Describe an appropriate data model given the scope and workflows
      • Provide illustrative wireframes for a user interface (UI) to such a system

      Digital Scholarship | Digital Scholarship Sitemap

      Be Sociable, Share!

        "One More Chunk of DOAJ"

        Posted in Open Access, Publishing, Scholarly Journals on February 5th, 2015

        Walt Crawford has published "One More Chunk of DOAJ" in Cites & Insights Crawford at Large.

        Here's an excerpt:

        Because there will be a published concise version of all this stuff—out this summer from ALA's Library Technology Reports, working title "Idealism and Opportunism: The State of Open Access Journals"—I went through 2,200-odd additional DOAJ journals with English as one of the language options (but not the first one), and was able to add 1,507 more entries to my DOAJ master spreadsheet, which now includes 6,490 journals qualifying for full analysis and 811 that don't. This essay offers some summary information on the 1,507 added journals and some overall notes on the full DOAJ set-including some new and replacement tables (there may be errors in tables 2.66 b and c and 2.67 b and c in earlier issues).

        Digital Scholarship | Digital Scholarship Sitemap

        Be Sociable, Share!

          "Who Should We Trust?"

          Posted in Open Access, Publishing on February 2nd, 2015

          Kevin Smith has published "Who Should We Trust?" in Scholarly Communications @ Duke.

          Here's an excerpt:

          It is not that we exactly trust commercial publishers, nor do we exactly distrust them. We may recognize that the values and goals of the commercial publishing business are different from, and even in conflict with, the best interests of scholarly authors and of scholarship itself. Perfectly nice people, working to advance their own interests as best they can, come in to conflict as the conditions for research and teaching change. And a real ambivalence is created because of how interwoven the parts of the academic enterprise are. More than just inertia is a work; important aspects of the academic enterprise remain interlocked with traditional forms of publication.

          Digital Scholarship | Digital Scholarship Sitemap

          Be Sociable, Share!

            "PeerJ—A PLOS ONE Contender in 2015?"

            Posted in Open Access, Publishing, Scholarly Journals, Self-Archiving on February 2nd, 2015

            Phil Davis has published "PeerJ—A PLOS ONE Contender in 2015?" in The Scholarly Kitchen.

            Here's an excerpt:

            In my last post, I reported that PeerJ was growing, publishing more papers and attracting more authors, although it was not clear whether the company was moving toward financial stability. In a crowded market of multidisciplinary open access journals, I argued that the success (or failure) of PeerJ would be determined when it received its first Impact Factor, which will be announced in mid-June with the publication of Thomson Reuters' Journal Citation Report. The purpose of this post is to estimate PeerJ's first Impact Factor and discuss its implications.

            Digital Scholarship | Digital Scholarship Sitemap

            Be Sociable, Share!

              "Ask The Chefs: What Do You Think Will Have the Biggest Impact on Scholarly Publishing In 2015?"

              Posted in Open Access, Publishing, Scholarly Journals on January 29th, 2015

              Ann Michael has published "Ask the Chefs: What Do You Think Will Have The Biggest Impact on Scholarly Publishing In 2015" in The Scholarly Kitchen.

              Here's an excerpt:

              According to the Chefs, we're looking at a year of mergers and acquisitions, the continuing growth of open access both in number of opportunities and in scale, the publication of data and objects (like multimedia, application code, etc.), and more start-ups.

              Digital Scholarship | Digital Scholarship Sitemap

              Be Sociable, Share!

                Bibliometric Study on Dutch Open Access

                Posted in Open Access, Publishing, Reports and White Papers on January 28th, 2015

                The Government of the Netherlands has released Bibliometric Study on Dutch Open Access.

                Here's an excerpt:

                In this text we will primarily focus on the way Open Access (OA from now on) publications are represented in the Web of Science database. We have collected data for this analysis in two different ways, which leads to different perspectives on OA publishing in the Netherlands. We focus on the output of three smaller scientific nations in Europe, next to the Netherlands we focus on Denmark and Switzerland, as these countries do contest the scientific runner up positions globally after the USA, and are more or less of comparable volume in economic terms.

                Digital Scholarship | Digital Scholarship Sitemap

                Be Sociable, Share!

                  SciELO: 15 Years of Open Access

                  Posted in Open Access, Publishing, Scholarly Journals on January 28th, 2015

                  SciELO has released SciELO: 15 Years of Open Access.

                  Here's an excerpt:

                  The creation of SciELO 15 years ago and its further development were driven by two innovative and pioneering approaches: first, the indexing of national quality journals to complement international indexes and the publication of the full texts with free access on the Web in the modality known today as the "Golden Road", which took place about four years before the launch of the Budapest Declaration that is internationally agreed to as the beginning of the Open Access movement; and, second, the cooperative convergence of independent publishers, editors and national research agencies around a common objective to increase the visibility and quality of journals (Packer 1998; Meneghini, 2003; Packer 2009). During this development, SciELO became a standard of quality for the journals it indexes. As of June 2013, the SciELO network covers 15 Ibero-American countries plus South Africa, with each country publishing a national collection of journals in the network. There are also two multinational thematic collections in the network. Together these countries index about one thousand journal titles that publish more than 40 thousand articles per year. To date, the network has published a total of more than 400 thousand open access articles that receive a daily average of over 1.5 million article downloads, 65% as PDF files and 35% as HTML files.

                  Digital Scholarship | Digital Scholarship Sitemap

                  Be Sociable, Share!

                    "The Open Access Citation Advantage"

                    Posted in Open Access, Publishing, Scholarly Journals on January 26th, 2015

                    SPARC Europe has released "The Open Access Citation Advantage."

                    Here's an excerpt:

                    The OpCit project has for many years kept up to date a list of studies on whether or not there is a citation advantage for Open Access articles. That project has now completed and the list is no longer being managed. SPARC Europe is pleased to maintain the list henceforth and has brought it up to date.

                    Digital Scholarship | Digital Scholarship Sitemap

                    Be Sociable, Share!

                      Monographs and Open Access: A Report to HEFCE

                      Posted in E-Books, Open Access, Publishing, Scholarly Books on January 23rd, 2015

                      The HEFCE has released Monographs and Open Access: A Report to HEFCE.

                      Here's an excerpt from the announcement:

                      • Monographs are a vitally important and distinctive vehicle for research communication, and must be sustained in any moves to open access. The availability of printed books alongside the open-access versions will be essential.
                      • Contrary to many perceptions, it would not be appropriate to talk of a crisis of the monograph; this does not mean that monographs are not facing challenges, but the arguments for open access would appear to be for broader and more positive reasons than solving some supposed crisis.
                      • Open access offers both short- and long-term advantages for monograph publication and use; many of these are bound up with a transition to digital publishing that has not been at the same speed as that for journals.
                      • There is no single dominant emerging business model for supporting open-access publishing of monographs; a range of approaches will coexist for some time and it is unlikely that any single model will emerge as dominant. Policies will therefore need to be flexible.

                      Digital Scholarship | Digital Scholarship Sitemap

                      Be Sociable, Share!

                        Policy Recommendations for Open Access to Research Data

                        Posted in Data Curation, Open Data, and Research Data Management, Open Access, Reports and White Papers on January 20th, 2015

                        The RECODE project has released Policy Recommendations for Open Access to Research Data.

                        Here's an excerpt:

                        These policy recommendations are targeted at key stakeholders in the scholarly communication ecosystem, namely research funders, research institutions, data managers, and publishers. They will assist each of the stakeholders in furthering the goals of open access to research data by providing both over-arching and stakeholder-specific recommendations. These function, as suggestions to address and attend to central issues that RECODE identified through the research work.

                        The current report thus comprises:

                        • summary of project findings
                        • overarching recommendations
                        • targeted policy recommendations for funders, research institutions, data managers, and publishers
                        • practical guides for developing policies for funders, research institutions, data managers, and publishers
                        • resources to expedite the process of policy development and implementation among stakeholders

                        Digital Scholarship | Digital Scholarship Sitemap

                        Be Sociable, Share!

                          Page 4 of 99« First...23456...102030...Last »

                          DigitalKoans

                          DigitalKoans

                          Digital Scholarship

                          Copyright © 2005-2015 by Charles W. Bailey, Jr.

                          Creative Commons License
                          This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license.