Archive for the 'Publishing' Category

Pamela Samuelson et al. Send Letter to US District Court Judge Denny Chin about Authors Guild v. Google Case

Posted in Copyright, Digital Copyright Wars, E-Books, Google and Other Search Engines, Mass Digitizaton, Publishing on February 19th, 2012

Pamela Samuelson, Richard M. Sherman Distinguished Professor of Law and Information at the UC Berkeley School of Law, and other scholars have sent a letter ("Academic Author Objections to Plaintiff's Motion for Class Certification") to US District Court Judge Denny Chin about class certification issues in the Authors Guild v. Google Case.

Here's an excerpt:

We believe that our works of scholarship are more typical of the contents of research library collections than works of the three named plaintiffs in this case. Betty Miles is the author of numerous children's books. Jim Bouton is a former baseball pitcher who has written both fiction and nonfiction books based on his experiences as a baseball player. Joseph Goulden is a professional writer who has written a number of nonfiction books on a variety of subjects, including a book about "superlawyers." None of these three are academic authors. Their books are aimed at a popular, rather than an academic, audience. As professional writers, their motivations and interests in having their books published would understandably be different, and likely more commercial, than those of academic scholars. Hence, our concern is that these three do not share the academic interests that are typical of authors of books in research library collections. As we explain further below, the clearest indication that the named plaintiffs do not share the same priorities typical of academic authors is their insistence on pursuing this litigation.

| Google Books Bibliography | Digital Scholarship |

Be Sociable, Share!

    Journal of Digital Humanities to Launch in March

    Posted in Digital Humanities, E-Journals, Publishing, Scholarly Journals on February 15th, 2012

    The Journal of Digital Humanities will launch this March.

    Here's an excerpt from the announcement:

    Digital Humanities Now is pleased to announce the Journal of Digital Humanities (ISSN 2165-6673), forthcoming in March 2012. In this comprehensive, peer-reviewed journal we will feature the best scholarship, projects, and tools produced by the digital humanities community in the previous quarter.

    The Journal of Digital Humanities will offer expanded coverage of the digital humanities in three ways. First, we publish scholarly work beyond the traditional research article. Second, we select content from open and public discussions in the field. Third, we encourage continued discussion through peer-to-peer review.

    The journal will be comprised of individual works that were selected as Editors' Choice in Digital Humanities Now. These works range from written texts, to visual arguments, to audio-visual presentations. In order to promote the peer review of non-traditional scholarship, each issue will include solicited reviews of digital tools. When the community focuses extensively on a particular topic, a special section of the issue will feature the broader conversation. In our inaugural issue, Natalia Cecire, a postdoctoral fellow at the Fox Center for Humanistic Inquiry at Emory University, will introduce and guest edit a special section about theory and the digital humanities.

    | Scholarly Electronic Publishing Bibliography, Version 80 | Digital Scholarship |

    Be Sociable, Share!

      "A Study of Open Access Journals Using Article Processing Charges"

      Posted in Open Access, Publishing, Scholarly Journals on February 15th, 2012

      David J. Solomon and Bo-Christer Björk have self-archived "A Study of Open Access Journals Using Article Processing Charges".

      Here's an excerpt:

      Article Processing Charges (APCs) are a central mechanism for funding Open Access (OA) scholarly publishing. We studied the APCs charged and article volumes of journals that were listed in the Directory of Open Access Journals as charging APCs. These included 1,370 journals that published 100,697 articles in 2010. The average APC was 906 US Dollars (USD) calculated over journals and 904 US Dollars USD calculated over articles. The price range varied between 8 and 3,900 USD, with the lowest prices charged by journals published in developing countries and the highest by journals with high impact factors from major international publishers. Journals in Biomedicine represent 59% of the sample and 58% of the total article volume. They also had the highest APCs of any discipline. Professionally published journals, both for profit and nonprofit had substantially higher APCs than society, university or scholar/researcher published journals. These price estimates are lower than some previous studies of OA publishing and much lower than is generally charged by subscription publishers making individual articles open access in what are termed hybrid journals.

      | Transforming Scholarly Publishing through Open Access: A Bibliography | Digital Scholarship Publications Overview |

      Be Sociable, Share!

        CLIR and NITLE Will Launch Anvil Academic, a "Digital Publisher for the Humanities"

        Posted in Digital Humanities, Publishing on February 14th, 2012

        The Council on Library and Information Resources and the National Institute for Technology in Liberal Education will launch Anvil Academic, a "digital publisher for the humanities," in late 2012.

        Here's an excerpt from the press release :

        Anvil will focus on publishing new forms of scholarship that cannot be adequately conveyed in the traditional monograph.

        "Increasingly, research in the humanities is dependent on large data sets and involves sophisticated algorithms and visualizations in the execution of that research and in the construction of the products of scholarship. Anvil will capture the environment in which this research is conducted: a linked ecology of scholarly expression, data, and tools of analysis that will over time become itself a place for new knowledge discovery," said CLIR President Chuck Henry.

        Works published through Anvil will be available through Creative Commons licenses on the Web and as apps on portable devices. The title production system will be developed jointly by NITLE and CLIR for use by other institutions, each of which would have the opportunity to publish under its own imprint. . . .

        "An important part of the Anvil experiment will be developing and testing new revenue models," said NITLE Executive Director Joey King. "Our current models, which rely heavily on institutional subsidies, author subventions, and revenue from sales of printed books, are not proving to be sustainable. With Anvil, we intend to explore alternative paths to sustainability as rigorously as we explore new publishing models."

        The program received startup funding from the Brown Foundation, Inc., in Houston, Texas. Stanford University, the University of Virginia, Washington University in St. Louis, Bryn Mawr College, Amherst College, Middlebury College, and Southwestern University will also provide funds and staffing. Anvil Academic Publishing will work closely with innovative programs developed by the University of Michigan, especially MPublishing, and draw on Johns Hopkins University's exemplary experience with digital humanities project development.

        | Digital Scholarship's Digital/Print Books | Digital Scholarship |

        Be Sociable, Share!

          California Digital Library and Public Knowledge Project Form Partnership to Advance Open Access Publishing

          Posted in Open Access, Open Source Software, Publishing on February 7th, 2012

          The California Digital Library and the Public Knowledge Project have formed a partnership to advance open access publishing through the development of open source publishing tools.

          Here's an excerpt from the press release:

          As a result of this agreement, the CDL will assist with PKP’s ongoing development and support of its open source software suite&,dash;Open Journal Systems (OJS), Open Conference Systems (OCS), and Open Harvester System (OHS), with Open Monograph Press (OMP) due for release in the coming year.

          The California Digital Library, in partnership with the University of California campus libraries, supports and encourages open access publishing initiatives within the UC system through its eScholarship publishing and institutional repository platform. eScholarship provides a suite of open access, scholarly publishing services and research tools that enable departments, research units, publishing programs, and individual scholars associated with the University of California to have direct control over the creation and dissemination of the full range of their scholarship. Home to 45 peer-reviewed journals (;browse-journal=aa), eScholarship has recently transitioned to OJS as its journal management and submission system and has integrated OJS with its pre/post-print, books and working papers repository, which contains more than 45,000 UC-affiliated publications. . . .

          PKP is dedicated to improving the scholarly and public quality of research. With more than 11,500 installations of Open Journal Systems (OJS); Open Conference Systems (OCS); and Open Harvester Systems (OHS) around the world, the Public Knowledge Project (PKP) has proven that open source software can be a game changer in scholarly publishing.

          | Digital Scholarship's Digital/Print Books | Digital Scholarship |

          Be Sociable, Share!

            Access to Scholarly Content: Gaps and Barriers

            Posted in Open Access, Publishing, Reports and White Papers, Scholarly Journals on February 5th, 2012

            The Research Information Network has released Access to Scholarly Content: Gaps and Barriers.

            Here's an excerpt:

            The overall aim of this study is to investigate and quantify the extent to which members of different communities in the UK can gain ready access to formally-published scholarly literature, in particular journal articles and conference proceedings. . . .

            Much of the information presented here is based on an online survey of researchers and knowledge workers from UK universities and colleges, medical schools and health providers, industry and commerce, and research institutes. . . .

            Other information in this report comes from a detailed analysis of the literature and secondary data analysis of the Labour Force Survey in an attempt to quantify the size of the UK professional knowledge worker sector.

            | Transforming Scholarly Publishing through Open Access: A Bibliography | Digital Scholarship Publications Overview |

            Be Sociable, Share!

              Faculty of 1000 to Launch F1000 Research Open Access Publishing Program

              Posted in Open Access, Publishing on January 30th, 2012

              The Faculty of 1000 has announced that it will launch its F1000 Research open access publishing program later this year.

              Here's an excerpt from the announcement :

              F1000 Research will diverge from traditional journal publishing as follows:

              1. Immediate publication (beyond an initial sanity check) upon submitting to the repository. . . .
              2. Open, post-publication peer review. . . .
              3. Revisioning of work. . . .
              4. Raw data repository. . . .
              5. "Article" format is not predefined. . . .
              6. "Article" content is not predefined. . . .

              Many questions remain as F1000 Research is fine-tuned to break new ground in scholarly publishing.

              • How much formal refereeing is required?
              • What is an article amendment versus an update?
              • What incentives are required to encourage post-publication refereeing, author response and revisions, and sharing of raw but template data?
              • What author fees are appropriate for the different types of content?

              | Transforming Scholarly Publishing through Open Access: A Bibliography | Digital Scholarship |

              Be Sociable, Share!

                Open Access: PEER Economics Report [Final Report]

                Posted in Digital Repositories, Institutional Repositories, Open Access, Publishing, Reports and White Papers, Self-Archiving on January 22nd, 2012

                PEER (Publishing and the Ecology of European Research) has released the final version of the PEER Economics Report.

                Here's an excerpt:

                This study considers the effect of large-scale deposit on scholarly research publication and dissemination (sharing of research outputs), beginning with the analysis of publishers and institutions managing repositories and their sustainability. The study associates costs with specific activities, performed by key actors involved in research registration, certification, dissemination and digital management: authors, the scholarly community, editors, publishers, libraries, readers and funding agencies. Contrary to most of the existing literature, the study analyses cost structures of individual organizations. The focus of this study is therefore to provide context for the costs to specific organizations and to their choices in terms of scale and scope. . . .

                This study analyses 22 organizations involved with journal article publication and dissemination. Data were gathered via literature and public document analysis, as well as through individual in-depth interviews in order to assess the cost structure of publishers, OA journal publishers and institutions managing repositories and the conditions for their sustainability.

                | Digital Scholarship's Digital Bibliographies | Digital Scholarship |

                Be Sociable, Share!

                  Page 30 of 103« First...1020...2829303132...405060...Last »



                  Digital Scholarship

                  Copyright © 2005-2013 by Charles W. Bailey, Jr.

                  Creative Commons License

                  This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.