Archive for the 'Self-Archiving' Category

"Accelerating Scientific Publication in Biology"

Posted in Open Science, Publishing, Scholarly Journals, Self-Archiving on July 22nd, 2015

Ronald D Vale has self-archived "Accelerating Scientific Publication in Biology."

Here's an excerpt:

Our analysis suggests that publication practices have changed considerably in the life sciences over the past thirty years. Considerably more experimental data is now required for publication, and the average time required for graduate students to publish their first paper has increased and is approaching the desirable duration of Ph.D. training. Since publication is generally a requirement for career progression, schemes to reduce the time of graduate student and postdoctoral training may be difficult to implement without also considering new mechanisms for accelerating communication of their work. The increasing time to publication also delays potential catalytic effects that ensue when many scientists have access to new information. The time has come for the life scientists, funding agencies, and publishers to discuss how to communicate new findings in a way that best serves the interests of the public and scientific community.

See also: "Thoughts on Ron Vale's 'Accelerating Scientific Publication in Biology'" by Michael Eisen.

Digital Scholarship | Digital Scholarship Sitemap

Be Sociable, Share!

    Emerald Announces Zero Embargo Trial for Library and Information Science Journals

    Posted in Open Access, Publishing, Scholarly Journals, Self-Archiving on July 15th, 2015

    Emerald has announced a zero embargo trial for library and information science journals.

    Here's an excerpt from the announcement:

    Emerald Group Publishing, global publisher linking research and practice, today announces the launch of its Green Open Access, Zero Embargo trial, applicable for all mandated articles submitted to the company's Library and Information Science (LIS) and selected Information and Knowledge Management journals.

    This change allows authors to deposit the post-print version of the article into their respective institutional repository immediately upon official publication, rather than after Emerald's 24 month embargo period for mandated articles. . . .

    The evaluation of this trial will help to inform future Emerald Open Access initiatives. Emerald will work with its Librarian Advisory Group to assess the impact of the trial, by monitoring the quality and volume of submissions, feedback from authors, and readership figures from both the Emerald platform and institutional repositories.

    See also: "Emerald and Open Access."

    | New: Research Data Curation Bibliography, Version 5 | Digital Scholarship | Digital Scholarship Sitemap

    Be Sociable, Share!

      "Dutch Universities Start Elsevier Boycott—Will This Be a Game Changer or Will Publisher Profits Remain Unaffected?"

      Posted in Open Access, Publishing, Scholarly Journals, Self-Archiving on July 9th, 2015

      LSE Impact of Social Sciences has released "Dutch Universities Start Elsevier Boycott—Will This Be a Game Changer or Will Publisher Profits Remain Unaffected?."

      Here's an excerpt:

      Led by vice chancellors, Dutch universities have recently announced plans for a country-wide boycott of the academic publisher Elsevier. This boycott has the potential to be a significant game changer in the relationship between the research community and the world's largest academic publisher. But how will it affect open access momentum in the UK and around the world? Here we have brought together two expert views on the subject. Danny Kingsley, the Head of Scholarly Communication at University of Cambridge and Steven Harnad, longtime advocate for open access, share their views on what the Dutch boycott can hope to achieve.

      | New: Research Data Curation Bibliography, Version 5 | Digital Scholarship | Digital Scholarship Sitemap

      Be Sociable, Share!

        23 Groups Oppose Elsevier’s New Sharing and Hosting Policy

        Posted in Open Access, Publishing, Scholarly Journals, Self-Archiving on May 21st, 2015

        SPARC has released "New Policy from Elsevier Impedes Open Access and Sharing."

        Here's an excerpt:

        [Statement]

        On April 30, 2015, Elsevier announced a new sharing and hosting policy for Elsevier journal articles. This policy represents a significant obstacle to the dissemination and use of research knowledge, and creates unnecessary barriers for Elsevier published authors in complying with funders' open access policies. In addition, the policy has been adopted without any evidence that immediate sharing of articles has a negative impact on publishers' subscriptions.

        Despite the claim by Elsevier that the policy advances sharing, it actually does the opposite. The policy imposes unacceptably long embargo periods of up to 48 months for some journals. It also requires authors to apply a "non-commercial and no derivative works" license for each article deposited into a repository, greatly inhibiting the re-use value of these articles. Any delay in the open availability of research articles curtails scientific progress and places unnecessary constraints on delivering the benefits of research back to the public.

        Furthermore, the policy applies to "all articles previously published and those published in the future" making it even more punitive for both authors and institutions. This may also lead to articles that are currently available being suddenly embargoed and inaccessible to readers.

        As organizations committed to the principle that access to information advances discovery, accelerates innovation and improves education, we support the adoption of policies and practices that enable the immediate, barrier free access to and reuse of scholarly articles. This policy is in direct conflict with the global trend towards open access and serves only to dilute the benefits of openly sharing research results.

        We strongly urge Elsevier to reconsider this policy and we encourage other organizations and individuals to express their opinions.

        The statement is available here and we welcome others to show their support by also endorsing it.

        The statement has been signed by the following groups:

        COAR: Confederation of Open Access Repositories
        SPARC: Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition
        ACRL: Association of College and Research Libraries
        ALA: American Library Association
        ARL: Association of Research Libraries
        Association of Southeastern Research Libraries
        Australian Open Access Support Group
        IBICT: Brazilian Institute of Information in Science and Technology
        CARL: Canadian Association of Research Libraries
        CLACSO: Consejo Latinoamericano de Ciencias Sociales
        COAPI: Coalition of Open Access Policy Institutions
        Creative Commons
        Creative Commons (USA)
        EIFL
        Electronic Frontier Foundation
        Greater Western Library Alliance
        LIBER: European Research Library Association
        National Science Library, Chinese Academy of Sciences
        OpenAIRE
        Open Data Hong Kong
        Research Libraries UK
        SANLiC: South African National Licensing Consortium
        University of St Andrews Library

        Digital Scholarship | Digital Scholarship Sitemap

        Be Sociable, Share!

          University of Windsor Senate Adopts Open Access Policy

          Posted in Open Access, Publishing, Scholarly Journals, Self-Archiving on May 19th, 2015

          The University of Windsor Senate has adopted an open access policy.

          Here's an excerpt from the announcement:

          In recognition of the importance of providing open access to Windsor research, and building on the momentum of the Tri-Council Open Access Policy (CIHR, NSERC, SSHRC), University Senate passed the University of Windsor's own open access policy (OA), Friday May 8. . . .

          In Canada, the recent release of the Tri-Agency Open Access Policy on Publications requires grant recipients, as of May 2015, to take steps to ensure that peer-reviewed journal publications arising from supported research are made freely accessible within 12 months of publication.

          Digital Scholarship | Digital Scholarship Sitemap

          Be Sociable, Share!

            University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Faculty Council Unanimously Adopts Open Access Policy

            Posted in Open Access, Publishing, Self-Archiving on May 8th, 2015

            The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Faculty Council has unanimously adopted an open access policy.

            Here's an excerpt from the announcement:

            Resolution 2015-9: On Endorsing a University Open Access Policy represented more than a year of work by a 35-member faculty Open Access Task Force. Chairs Todd Vision and Julie Kimbrough told the University Gazette that they worked diligently to craft a policy recommendation that could be applied differently according to the needs of various disciplines.

            UNC-CH is the 51st university or university unit to have adopted an open access policies by a unanimous faculty vote.

            Digital Scholarship | Digital Scholarship Sitemap

            Be Sociable, Share!

              "Stepping Back from Sharing"

              Posted in Open Access, Publishing, Scholarly Journals, Self-Archiving on May 5th, 2015

              Kevin Smith has published "Stepping Back from Sharing" in Scholarly Communications @ Duke.

              Here's an excerpt:

              Two major features of this retreat from openness need to be highlighted. First, it imposes an embargo of at least one year on all self-archiving of final authors' manuscripts, and those embargoes can be as long as four years. Second, when the time finally does roll around when an author can make her own work available through an institutional repository, Elsevier now dictates how that access is to be controlled, mandating the most restrictive form of Creative Commons license, the CC-BY-NC-ND license for all green open access.

              See also: "Elsevier Updates Its Article-Sharing Policies, Perspectives and Services" and "GET IT IN WRITING: On Elsevier's Revised Sharing/Hosting Policies."

              Digital Scholarship | Digital Scholarship Sitemap

              Be Sociable, Share!

                "Global Scholarship: The Role of Subject Repositories in Advancing Research from the Developing World"

                Posted in Digital Repositories, Disciplinary Archives, Open Access, Self-Archiving on May 5th, 2015

                Julia Kelly and Linda Eells have published "Global Scholarship: The Role of Subject Repositories in Advancing Research from the Developing World" in College & Research Libraries News.

                Here's an excerpt:

                While subject repositories successfully fill a scholarly communication niche in particular disciplines, they have not been recognized for the important role they play in promoting global scholarship. Repositories such as AgEcon Search make valuable and unique contributions by increasing publishing options for researchers and thus exposing and distributing research produced in the developing world.

                Digital Scholarship | Digital Scholarship Sitemap

                Be Sociable, Share!

                  Elsevier: "Unleashing the Power of Academic Sharing"

                  Posted in Open Access, Publishing, Scholarly Journals, Self-Archiving on May 4th, 2015

                  Elsevier has released "Unleashing the Power of Academic Sharing."

                  Here's an excerpt:

                  Elsevier's updated sharing and hosting policies explain how articles published with Elsevier may be shared and made available. These provide a more clear and consistent framework that is aligned with the rest of the publishing industry, and which is based on feedback from our authors and institutional partners. While we know the policy changes will not go as far as some would like, we believe they strike an appropriate balance between the rights and responsibilities of sharing.

                  Digital Scholarship | Digital Scholarship Sitemap

                  Be Sociable, Share!

                    "A Network Approach to Scholarly Communication Infrastructure"

                    Posted in Open Access, Publishing, Self-Archiving on April 28th, 2015

                    Rebecca Kennison and Lisa Norberg have published "A Network Approach to Scholarly Communication Infrastructure" in EDUCAUSE Review.

                    Here's an excerpt:

                    The open-access movement, fueled by the digital revolution, is transforming the business of scholarly communication, affecting the entire value chain. Rapidly emerging technologies have been crucial enablers of this transformation, blurring traditional roles and attracting new participants. The infrastructure and the economic framework established to support a centuries-old model of scholarly publishing are no longer adequate to the task. We believe that a radically different approach is required-one that is open, flexible, collaborative, and networked.

                    Digital Scholarship | Digital Scholarship Sitemap

                    Be Sociable, Share!

                      50 Universities or University Units Have Now Adopted Open Access Policies by Unanimous Faculty Votes

                      Posted in Open Access, Publishing, Scholarly Journals, Self-Archiving on April 20th, 2015

                      With recent votes by Boston University and University of Delaware faculty, 50 universities or university units, such as schools, have now adopted open access policies by unanimous faculty votes.

                      Here's a list from Unanimous Faculty Votes. See the original document for omitted details, and see the recently revised (and praised) Registry of Open Access Repositories Mandatory Archiving Policies (ROARMAP) for a complete list of over 670 open access policies.

                      1. February 12, 2008. Harvard University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences
                      2. April 27, 2008. Macquarie University
                      3. May 7, 2008, Harvard University, School of Law
                      4. June 10, 2008, Stanford University, School of Education
                      5. October 2008, University College London (UCL)
                      6. February 11, 2009. Boston University
                      7. March 6, 2009, Oregon State University, Library Faculty
                      8. March 18, 2009, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)
                      9. May 2009. University of Calgary, division of Library and Cultural Resources
                      10. May 2009. University of Pretoria
                      11. May 7, 2009, University of Oregon, Library Faculty
                      12. May 14, 2009, University of Oregon, Department of Romance Languages
                      13. May 14, 2009, Gustavus Adolphus College, Library Faculty
                      14. October 1, 2009, York University, librarians and archivists
                      15. October, 2009. Universidad de Oriente (Venezuela)
                      16. November 18, 2009, Oberlin College
                      17. December 2, 2009, University of Northern Colorado, Library Faculty
                      18. February 1, 2010, Wake Forest University, Library faculty
                      19. February 9, 2010, California Polytechnic State University
                      20. February 12, 2010, Oregon State University College of Oceanic and Atmospheric Sciences (COAS)
                      21. February 24, 2010, University of Virginia
                      22. February 25, 2010, Rollins College Faculty of Arts and Sciences
                      23. March 18, 2010, Duke University
                      24. March 24, 2010, University of Puerto Rico School of Law
                      25. April 19, 2010, San Jose State University
                      26. September 27, 2010, University of Northern Colorado
                      27. October 2010, Trinity College Dublin
                      28. December 22, 2010, Columbia University's Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory
                      29. March 15, 2011, Emory University
                      30. May 11, 2011, University of Pennsylvania
                      31. September 2011, Princeton University
                      32. October 19, 2011, Florida State University
                      33. December 8, 2011, Pacific University
                      34. January 27, 2012, Bifröst University
                      35. February 15, 2012, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education at the University of Toronto
                      36. April 2012, Utah State University
                      37. May 21, 2012, University of California, San Francisco
                      38. February 6, 2013, Wellesley College
                      39. March 4, 2013, College of Wooster
                      40. March 5, 2013, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Library faculty
                      41. March 21, 2013, University of Rhode Island
                      42. April 2013, Mailman School of Public Health at Columbia University
                      43. June 13, 2013, Oregon State University
                      44. December 2013, Télé-université (TELUQ), Université du Québec
                      45. December 2, 2013, Columbia University, School of Social Work
                      46. June 18, 2014, Harvard Medical School
                      47. October 7, 2014, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI)
                      48. October 9, 2014, Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University
                      49. February 11, 2015, Boston University
                      50. April 6, 2015, University of Delaware

                      Digital Scholarship | Digital Scholarship Sitemap

                      Be Sociable, Share!

                        "Open Access Policy: Numbers, Analysis, Effectiveness"

                        Posted in Legislation and Government Regulation, Open Access, Publishing, Reports and White Papers, Scholarly Journals, Self-Archiving on April 13th, 2015

                        A. Swan et al. have self-archived "Open Access Policy: Numbers, Analysis, Effectiveness".

                        Here's an excerpt:

                        The PASTEUR4OA project analyses what makes an Open Access (OA) policy effective. The total number of institutional or funder OA policies worldwide is now 663 (March 2015), over half of them mandatory. ROARMAP, the policy registry, has been rebuilt to record more policy detail and provide more extensive search functionality. Deposit rates were measured for articles in institutions' repositories and compared to the total number of WoS-indexed articles published from those institutions. Average deposit rate was over four times as high for institutions with a mandatory policy. Six positive correlations were found between deposit rates and (1) Must-Deposit; (2) Cannot-Waive-Deposit; (3) Deposit-Linked-to-Research-Evaluation; (4) Cannot-Waive-Rights-Retention; (5) Must-Make-Deposit-OA (after allowable embargo) and (6) Can-Waive-OA. For deposit latency, there is a positive correlation between earlier deposit and (7) Must-Deposit-Immediately as well as with (4) Cannot-Waive-Rights-Retention and with mandate age. There are not yet enough OA policies to test whether still further policy conditions would contribute to mandate effectiveness but the present findings already suggest that it would be useful for current and future OA policies to adopt the seven positive conditions so as to accelerate and maximise the growth of OA.

                        Digital Scholarship | Digital Scholarship Sitemap

                        Be Sociable, Share!

                          Page 1 of 2112345...1020...Last »

                          DigitalKoans

                          DigitalKoans

                          Digital Scholarship

                          Copyright © 2005-2015 by Charles W. Bailey, Jr.

                          Creative Commons License
                          This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license.