In a posting on Google Blogoscoped, Philipp Lenssen has announced that he has put up 100 public domain books from Google Book Search on Authorama.
Regarding his action, Lenssen says:
In other words, Google imposes restrictions on these books which the public domain does not impose*. I’m no lawyer, and maybe Google can print whatever guidelines they want onto those books. . . and being no lawyer, most people won’t know if the guidelines are a polite request, or legally enforceable terms**. But as a proof of concept—the concept of the public domain—I’ve now ‘set free’ 100 books I downloaded from Google Book Search by republishing them on my public domain books site, Authorama. I’m not doing this out of disrespect for the Google Books program (which I think is cool, and I’ll credit Google on Authorama) but out of respect for the public domain (which I think is even cooler).
Since Lenssen has retained Google’s usage guidelines in the e-books, it’s unclear how they have been "set free," in spite of the following statement on Authorama’s Books from Google Book Search page:
The following books were downloaded from Google Book Search and are made available here as public domain. You can download, republish, mix and mash these books, for private or public, commercial or non-commercial use.
Leaving aside the above statement, Lenssen’s action appears to violate the following Google usage guideline, where Google asks that users:
Make non-commercial use of the files We designed Google Book Search for use by individuals, and we request that you use these files for personal, non-commercial purposes.
However, in the above guideline, Google uses the word "request," which suggests voluntary, rather than mandatory, compliance. Google also requests attribution and watermark retention.
Maintain attribution The Google ‘watermark’ you see on each file is essential for informing people about this project and helping them find additional materials through Google Book Search. Please do not remove it.
Note the use of the word "please."
It’s not clear how to determine if Google’s watermark remains in the Authorama files, but, given the retention of the usage guidelines, it likely does.
So, do Google’s public domain books really need to be "set free"? In its usage guidelines, Google appears to make compliance requests, not compliance requirements. Are such requests binding or not? If so, the language could be clearer. For example, here’s a possible rewording:
Make non-commercial use of the files Google Book Search is for individual use only, and its files can only be used for personal, non-commercial purposes. All other use is prohibited.
Please note:
http://blog.librarylaw.com/librarylaw/2004/07/the_public_doma.html
> Since Lenssen has retained Google’s usage guidelines
> in the e-books, it’s unclear how they have been
> “set free,” in spite of the following statement on
> Authorama
Charles, I agree removing the watermark + Google introduction would be better. I just didn’t know how. Brian Mingus in the comments thread to my post now says:
“… the easiest way to remove the notices for one book is to use Adobe Acrobat Professional. Just go to Document > Delete Pages > 1 to 1. That’s it.”
As far as how legally binding Google’s guidelines are, Google issued an official statement emphasizing they’re meant only as voluntary “netiquette”. Still, I doubt most users will be able to tell the one from the others — simply because most users aren’t lawyers.
My own method of “setting free” google scans is linking to them extensively from Wikipedia articles. Think of a simple work list of any 18th or 19th century author and now compare it with a work list that has a link to each work. It makes all the difference.
These books are somewhat hidden in books.google.com – a normal google search (which is what 99% of google users may find sufficient) will not reveal them. Much the same goes for all digitization projects. My wish: If you find digitized works that you think will be useful for others, link to them wherever you can.
Philipp:
Thanks for your reply.
Since your goal is to alert users that the works remain in the public domain because the Google guidelines are strictly voluntary, perhaps you should discuss that issue first in your Google Book Search page. That way, when users find the guidelines in the files, they won’t become confused.
Of course, this doesn’t deal with the issue of later confusion due to subsequent redistribution of files found on your page because the guidelines remain in the files.