https://openapc.github.io/general/openapc/2019/11/15/wellcome/
Category: Open Access
"Taking the Temperature on Open Access among UC Berkeley Faculty"
"Course Journals: Leveraging Library Publishing to Engage Students at the Intersection of Open Pedagogy, Scholarly Communications, and Information Literacy"
"American Chemical Society Signs Their First Transformative Agreement with Hungarian EISZ Consortium"
"Why NIH Is Beefing up Its Data Sharing Rules after 16 Years"
Will SUNY “Follow the Lead of UC”?: "Resolution: Support for SUNY Negotiations for a Fair and Reasonable Contract with Elsevier"
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that UFS recommends and requests that if Elsevier does not negotiate a contract that is deemed fair and reasonable by SUNY negotiators, the Chancellor direct the SUNY negotiators to follow the lead of UC and the aforementioned European universities and not enter into a new contract with Elsevier, and instead pursue alternative means with campus presidents to access scholarly works that are critical to the learning, teaching, and research of the SUNY community;
"If We Choose to Align Open Access to Research with Geo-Political Borders We Negate the Moral Value of Open Access"
Paywall Article: "bioRxiv: Trends and Analysis of Five Years of Preprints"
Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation APC Data: "Transparency: What Can One Learn from a Trove of Invoices?"
Paywall Article: "Issues with Criteria to Create Blacklists: An Epidemiological Approach"
NIH as Example: "How Open Is the Open Data Produced by the U.S. Government?"
"Does the Use of Open, Non-Anonymous Peer Review in Scholarly Publishing Introduce Bias? Evidence from the F1000 Post-Publication Open Peer Review Publishing Model"
"Identifying Publications in Questionable Journals in the Context of Performance-Based Research Funding"
"Leaked Document on Elsevier Negotiations Sparks Controversy"
"Hungary and Elsevier Agree Pilot National License for Research Access and Open Access Publishing"
Recommendations of the Ad Hoc Task Force on Open Access to MIT’s Research
MIT has released "Recommendations of the Ad Hoc Task Force on Open Access to MIT's Research."
Here's an excerpt:
The recommendations include ratifying an Institute-wide set of principles for open science and open scholarship, which affirm MIT's larger commitment to the idea that scholarship and its dissemination should remain in the hands of researchers and their institutions. The MIT Libraries are working with the task force and the Committee on the Library System to develop a framework for negotiations with publishers based on these principles.
Research Data Curation Bibliography, Version 10 | Digital Curation and Digital Preservation Works | Open Access Works | Digital Scholarship | Digital Scholarship Sitemap
"The Second Wave of Preprint Servers: How Can Publishers Keep Afloat?"
"Jisc Secures Two-Year Pilot Transitional Open Access Agreement with Microbiology Society"
Paywall Article: "Effects of Journal Choice on the Visibility of Scientific Publications: A Comparison Between Subscription-Based and Full Open Access Models"
Paywall Article: "The Open Access Citation Premium May Depend on the Openness and Inclusiveness of the Indexing Database, but the Relationship Is Controversial Because It Is Ambiguous Where the Open Access Boundary Lies"
"The NIH Open Citation Collection: A Public Access, Broad Coverage Resource"
B. Ian Hutchins et al.have published "The NIH Open Citation Collection: A Public Access, Broad Coverage Resource" in PLoS Biology.
Here's an excerpt:
Citation data have remained hidden behind proprietary, restrictive licensing agreements, which raises barriers to entry for analysts wishing to use the data, increases the expense of performing large-scale analyses, and reduces the robustness and reproducibility of the conclusions. For the past several years, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Office of Portfolio Analysis (OPA) has been aggregating and enhancing citation data that can be shared publicly. Here, we describe the NIH Open Citation Collection (NIH-OCC), a public access database for biomedical research that is made freely available to the community. This dataset, which has been carefully generated from unrestricted data sources such as MedLine, PubMed Central (PMC), and CrossRef, now underlies the citation statistics delivered in the NIH iCite analytic platform. We have also included data from a machine learning pipeline that identifies, extracts, resolves, and disambiguates references from full-text articles available on the internet. Open citation links are available to the public in a major update of iCite (https://icite.od.nih.gov).
Research Data Curation Bibliography, Version 10 | Digital Curation and Digital Preservation Works | Open Access Works | Digital Scholarship | Digital Scholarship Sitemap
Open Scholarship and the Need for Collective Action
Cameron Neylon et al. have self-archived Open Scholarship and the Need for Collective Action.
Here's an excerpt:
The book aims to increase understanding of the challenges to make scholarship more open. It addresses various perspectives offered by KE's Open Scholarship Framework, combining levels (micro, meso and macro-level actors), arenas (political, economic, social, technical) and research phases (discovery, planning, project phase, dissemination).
Research Data Curation Bibliography, Version 10 | Digital Curation and Digital Preservation Works | Open Access Works | Digital Scholarship | Digital Scholarship Sitemap