A three-segment video about the historical development of open access to legal information, titled A Short History of Legal Information Institutes, is available from LexUM on YouTube.
Abridged Version of Developing Open Access Journals: A Practical Guide Available
David J. Solomon has made a 19-page abridged version of his book Developing Open Access Journals: A Practical Guide freely available.
Association of College and Research Libraries Sends a Letter of Support to SCOAP3
The Association of College and Research Libraries has sent a letter of support to SCOAP3.
Here's an excerpt:
On behalf of the Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL), a division of the American Library Association (ALA) representing over 13,000 academic and research librarians and interested individuals, I am writing to express interest and support for SCOAP3, the Sponsoring Consortium for Open Access Publishing in Particle Physics’ effort to facilitate open access publishing in High Energy Physics (HEP). . . .
ACRL believes that SCOAP3 is a valuable addition to the heterogeneous mix of strategies being undertaken by scholars, publishers, libraries, and others to ensure the future of high-quality journals. SCOAP3 is unique in its explicit goals to unite researchers and libraries and to partner with publishers so that aggregated financial contributions will support HEP publishing, make the results available at no cost to any reader any where, and serve as a potential model to other disciplines.
Therefore ACRL encourages its members to consider joining the SCOAP3 effort when appropriate, e.g. through an institutional or consortial "expression of interest" (as outlined at http://www.scoap3.org/), providing education and outreach about SCOAP3 to their faculty, library staff and administrators, and finding other ways to analyze and support SCOAP3 where possible.
Registry of U.S. Government Publication Digitization Projects Enhanced
The Registry of U.S. Government Publication Digitization Projects has been significantly enhanced.
Here's an excerpt from the announcement:
The enhanced Registry provides the ability to:
- Browse digitization projects by category or alphabetically by title.
- Search the entire Registry or filter searches by category or fields.
- Quickly access new and recently updated listings.
- Utilize RSS feeds to keep informed of new and updated projects.
- View listings by contributor.
- Contact fellow digitization participants.
- Recommend listings to others.
- Report broken links.
- And much more!
Aberystwyth University Launches CADAIR Institutional Repository
Aberystwyth University has launched CADAIR, its DSpace-based institutional repository.
Here's an excerpt from the press release:
The new service has been developed by the Subject Support and E-Library team in Information Services, led by Dr Talat Chaudhri and Stuart Lewis.
A successful two year pilot project, during which the team worked closely with the Departments of Computer Science and Information Studies, and the Institute of Mathematics and Physics, was concluded in early 2008. Currently the site features approximately 500 academic papers and dissertations by taught masters and PhD students.
Survey of Canadian and International Data Management Initiatives Released
The Canadian Association of Research Libraries (CARL) has released Survey of Canadian and International Data Management Initiatives.
Here's an excerpt from the "Introduction":
Research libraries have a role to play in this emerging data-intensive environment. A 2007 CARL survey found that most CARL members are interested in managing research data, but few have a formal data archiving policy. CARL has formed a Research Data Management Working Group to assist members in collecting, organizing, preserving and providing access to the research data and to formulate a cooperative approach for CARL.
The purpose of this report is to provide an overview of the types of data management activities being undertaken in Canada and internationally. This review documents the various options available for libraries, and will pave the way for a more detailed investigation by the Working Group of the potential roles for libraries.
POD Magazine Production from PDFs: HP Labs' MagCloud Beta
MagCloud is an HP Labs beta research project that lets individuals publish print full-color magazines at no cost. A user-determined markup determines magazine profit. MagCloud handles all of the logistical aspects of magazine publishing, such as subscription management and distribution. As a beta, there are some limitations to this service.
2007 Impact Factors for PLoS Journals Released
The Public Library of Science has reported the 2007 impact factors for its journals as calculated by Thomson Reuters:
- PLoS Biology: 13.5
- PLoS Medicine: 12.6
- PLoS Computational Biology: 6.2
- PLoS Genetics: 8.7
- PLoS Pathogens: 9.3
Here's an excerpt from the press release:
As we and others have frequently pointed out, impact factors should be interpreted with caution and only as one of a number of measures which provide insight into a journal’s, or rather its articles’, impact. Nevertheless, the 2007 figures for PLoS Biology and PLoS Medicine are consistent with the many other indicators (e.g. submission volume, web statistics, reader and community feedback) that these journals are firmly established as top-flight open-access general interest journals in the life and health sciences respectively.
The increases in the impact factors for the discipline-based, community-run PLoS journals also tally with indicators that these journals are going from strength to strength. For example, submissions to PLoS Computational Biology, PLoS Genetics and PLoS Pathogens have almost doubled over the past year—each journal now routinely receives 80-120 submissions per month of which around 20-25 are published. . . .
Although Thomson is yet to index our two youngest journals, other indexing databases are. The subscription-only Scopus citation index (owned by Elsevier and, incidentally, including many more journals than Thomson’s offering) is already covering PLoS ONE (though so far, only as far back as June 2007). But authors don’t need to rely on subscription-only indexes such as those owned by Thomson and Elsevier, and can instead use the freely-available Google Scholar. Using Google Scholar, for example, one can find that the article by Neal Fahlgren and coauthors, about the cataloguing of an important class of RNA in plants and one of the most highly cited PLoS ONE articles so far has been cited 42 times—strong evidence that good research, even if published in a new journal, will rapidly find its place in the scientific record when it’s made freely available to all.
Second Beta Version of Fedora 3.0 Released
The Fedora Commons has released the second beta version of Fedora 3.0.
Here's an excerpt from the announcement:
Fedora 3.0 features the Content Model Architecture (CMA), an integrated structure for persisting and delivering the essential characteristics of digital objects in Fedora. . . . The Fedora CMA plays a central role in the Fedora architecture, in many ways forming the over-arching conceptual framework for future development of Fedora Repositories.
Like a well-thumbed book on a shelf, digital content is stored with the expectation that intellectual works will be the same each time they are accessed, whether the content was put away yesterday, or many years ago. Fedora is a simple, flexible and evolvable approach to delivering and sharing the "essential characteristics" of enduring digital content. Librarians, archivists, records managers, media producers, authors and publishers use patterns of expression formats such as books, journals, articles, collections to convey the essential characteristics of content. The capabilities of digital tools combined with essential characteristics of digital works result in well-understood patterns of expression for different types of content models.
The software engineering community also utilizes patterns of expression for the development of complex computer systems. The same concepts that satisfy agile IT infrastructures can help provide solutions for creating, accessing and preserving content. The Fedora CMA builds on the Fedora architecture-downloaded more than 18,000 times in the last 12 months—to simplify use while unlocking potential.
Dan Davis explains the CMA in the context of Fedora 3.0, "It's a hybrid. The Fedora CMA handles content models that are used by publishers and others, and is also a computer model that describes an information representation and processing architecture." By combining these viewpoints, Fedora CMA has the potential to provide a way to build an interoperable repository for integrated information access within organizations and to provide durable access to our intellectual works.
Transcript of DSpace/Fedora Meeting on Potential Collaboration
A transcript of the June 10, 2008 meeting between DSpace Foundation and Fedora Commons representatives about possible collaboration between these organizations has been released. A recording of most of the meeting is also available as an MP3 file.
The Web Imagined in 1934 Using Index Cards, Telegraphs, and Other Analog Tools
In 1934, Belgian Paul Otlet wrote a book in which he envisioned a worldwide "mechanical, collective brain" that would store and make accessible the world's knowledge. By that time, he had created with co-visionary Henri La Fontaine a "database" of over 12 million index cards and was responding to over 1,500 queries a year. Unfortunately, the project's sponsor, the Belgian government, withdrew support, the Nazis invaded, they displaced the project to make way for a Third Reich art exhibit, and Otlet died in relative obscurity in 1944.
Read more about it at "Paul Otlet," The Universe of Information: the Work of Paul Otlet for Documentation and International Organisation, "Visions of Xanadu: Paul Otlet (1868-1944) and Hypertext," and "The Web Time Forgot."
Usenet Newsgroups Will Be Blocked By Major ISPs
Spurred on by New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo’s efforts to fight child pornography, Sprint, Time Warner Cable. and Verizon will block significant numbers of Usenet news groups.
Regarding the Verizon ban, Declan McCullagh points out that only 8 of 1,000 Usenet hierarchies are being kept, and "That means not carrying perfectly innocuous—and, in fact, very useful—newsgroups like symantec.customerservice.general, us.military, microsoft.public.excel, and fr.soc.economie."
Read more about it at: "alt.blocked: Verizon Blocks Access to Whole USENET Hierarchy" "ISPs: We're Limiting Our Own Usenet Groups, Not Blocking Others" "N.Y. Attorney General Forces ISPs to curb Usenet Access" "Verizon Offers Details of Usenet Deletion: alt.* groups, Others Gone"
Short Quotes Not Fair Use? Associated Press Sends Take-Down Letter to Drudge Retort
The Associated Press has sent the Drudge Retort a DMCA take-down letter demanding that 6 posts and one comment with short quotes from AP articles be removed from the site.
Negative reaction from bloggers and others against what was viewed as an assault on fair use was swift, resulting in a TechCrunch ban on AP story use, a broader AP ban by bloggers, and a wave of criticism.
As a result, AP decided to halt further action against other Weblogs until new guidelines could be established, but it has not withdrawn its letter the Drudge Retort.
Read more about it at: "Associated Press Digs Its Own Grave Deeper; Wants to Create Its Own Fair Use Rules," "The Associated Press to Set Guidelines for Using Its Articles in Blogs," "AP Rethinking Policy After Drudge Retort DMCA Takedowns," "AP Takes Action against Community News Website over Copyright Violation," "AP Wants Change in Blog Excerpting, Just Not Sure What," "DMCA Takedown Tiff Not a Battle the AP Should Be Fighting," "Netroots' Bloggers Boycott of Associated Press Is Working," and "Welcome to the Web Refactory, AP."
Reactions to the "Canadian DMCA" (Bill C-61)
There have been strong reactions to the "Canadian DMCA" (Bill C-61) by both advocates and opponents. Copyright for Canadians has put up a "Tell MPs What's Wrong with the Prentice Bill" page that helps opponents contact their Members of Parliament.
Here's a selection of articles and posts: "Appropriation Art Condemns Bill C-61," "Bill C-61: First Reactions," "Canadian Creator and Music Industry Groups Applaud Introduction of Copyright Bill," "The Canadian DMCA: A Betrayal," "Canadian Library Association Disappointed with New Copyright Legislation," "CIPPIC Disappointed with New Copyright Bill," "CMCC: Copyright Reform Bill Doesn’t Help Canadian Artists," "Conservatives Deliver Rehearsed Responses on Bill C-61," "Copyright Law Could Result in Police State: Critics," "Copyright Reform a Good First Step," "Industry Group Applauds Bill," "Software Industry Praises Federal Government Plans to Modernize Canadian Copyright Act," and "TPM and Bill C-61."
ARL Summary of U.S. Orphan Works Legislation
The Association of Research Libraries has released a useful 10-page summary of current U.S. orphan works legislation, which includes a discussion of public university and state sovereign immunity issues.
Oil, ALA, and Digital Communities
I follow the energy markets closely, and recently there have been predictions of $250 a barrel oil in 2009 and $400 a barrel oil in 2018.
What does this have to do with ALA? Nothing, if ALA functioned effectively as a virtual organization that wasn't dependent on physical travel. Everything, if it is not.
Already we see airlines consolidating, cutting routes, and raising ticket and auxiliary prices. That's with oil at about $136 a barrel. Imagine if it were $250 a barrel or $400 a barrel. Impossible? Unlikely? Maybe, but in early 2007 it was $60 a barrel, and predictions of $100 a barrel met with incredulity.
We can hope that oil prices stabilize or decline, but it may be prudent to plan for what to do if they do not.
Would ALA function well if its committee members were increasingly unable to attend meetings? Would the organization's current awareness and personal networking functions that physical conferences support work if general members were increasingly unable to attend them?
Ask yourself this: If you never attended ALA conferences, how would the organization look to you? Would you feel that you could meaningfully participate in it? Would you feel that it had added value as an important source of current information, personal networking, and professional development?
Perhaps. In recent years, ALA has make progress in creating a more useful digital presence with efforts like virtual committee members, blogs, wikis, and other tools. This is commendable progress; however, much remains to be done. Do virtual committee members interact with physical committee members in real-time meetings? Is there meaningful non-conference committee digital interaction? Are conference presentations and committee meeting sessions available to ALA members in MP3 and digital video formats? Are blogs open to all potential member authors through self-initiated registration procedures? Are wikis dynamic information exchange mechanisms or primarily dull descriptive tools for disseminating information about ALA and its divisions? Is social network software provided to connect members with each other, committee members, and ALA officers? Is there is a true sense of a vibrant digital community?
Although its not perfect, the EDUCAUSE CONNECT community points in the direction of what could be.
Of course, energy markets are volatile, prices could drop, and all could be well for a while, but there is little to suggest at the current time that the long-term prospects for cheap energy are good. Thinking the unthinkable about reinventing ALA as a digital community might not be a bad idea as a contingency plan, and it might not be a bad idea in any case.
Citation Statistics Report Released
The International Mathematical Union in cooperation with the International Council of Industrial and Applied Mathematics and the Institute of Mathematical Statistics have released Citation Statistics.
Here's an excerpt from the Executive Summary:
This is a report about the use and misuse of citation data in the assessment of scientific research. The idea that research assessment must be done using "simple and objective" methods is increasingly prevalent today. The "simple and objective" methods are broadly interpreted as bibliometrics, that is, citation data and the statistics derived from them. There is a belief that citation statistics are inherently more accurate because they substitute simple numbers for complex judgments, and hence overcome the possible subjectivity of peer review. But this belief is unfounded.
- Relying on statistics is not more accurate when the statistics are improperly used. Indeed, statistics can mislead when they are misapplied or misunderstood. Much of modern bibliometrics seems to rely on experience and intuition about the interpretation and validity of citation statistics.
- While numbers appear to be "objective", their objectivity can be illusory. The meaning of a citation can be even more subjective than peer review. Because this subjectivity is less obvious for citations, those who use citation data are less likely to understand their limitations.
- The sole reliance on citation data provides at best an incomplete and often shallow understanding of research—an understanding that is valid only when reinforced by other judgments. Numbers are not inherently superior to sound judgments
Copyright Legislation: Canadian "DMCA" Bill Introduced
The Canadian Industry Minister Jim Prentice has introduced Bill-C61, often called the Canadian "DMCA" by its critics, into the House.
Read more about it at "A Breakdown of the New Digital Dos and Don'ts," "Canadian DRM Bill Creates Partisan Uproar," "'Canadian DMCA' Brings 'Balanced' Copyright to Canada," "The Canadian DMCA: Check the Fine Print," "Copyright Bill: All Ours, or a DMCA Copy?," "David Fewer Of CIPPIC On Canadian DMCA Bombshell" (includes video), "Industry Minister Jim Prentice Introduces The Canadian DMCA" (includes video), "New Copyright Act Targets Online Piracy," and "Ottawa Tables Copyright Bill."
More about ALA, CLA, and Open Access
Peter Suber has commented on my "On ALA, CLA, and Open Access" posting:
PS: For background, see Charles' previous report on OA for ALA publications (July 2006). In my comment at the time, I pointed out some of the ALA's public statements in support of OA: "(1) the ALA Washington office has a page on OA, (2) the ALA Council adopted a resolution in support of FRPAA at its June 2006 annual meeting, and (3) the ALA has signed on to several public statements in support of OA, most recently a July 12 letter in support of FRPAA and a May 31 letter in support of the EC report on OA."
Of course, I had reviewed Peter's prior comment before writing the new post. Here's a further analysis:
- The Washington Office open access page has not been updated since November 7, 2006. Given the rapid development of the open access field, this page appears to be moribund.
- The FRPAA resolution is a single-issue, focused statement. It is not a broad statement of principle, such as the CDA and IFLA statements. Moreover, FRPAA would have a minor effect on ALA's journal publishing operations if passed because it is: "A bill to provide for Federal agencies to develop public access policies relating to research conducted by employees of that agency or from funds administered by that agency." The ALA journals in question do not heavily publish such federally funded research.
- The "Letter Encouraging Hearings on the Federal Research Public Access Act of 2006" is a joint statement with other library associations, not a sole statement by ALA itself. My comments excluded "statements by ALA divisions or joint statements."
- The "Comments on the European Commission's 'Study on the Economic and Technical Evolution of the Scientific Publication Markets in Europe'" letter is by the Information Access Alliance, and, therefore is a joint letter, not a sole statement by ALA itself.
A good summary of other ALA joint statements, along with those of ACRL, can be found at "ACRL Taking Action."
Here's more information on ALA's "green" and "gold" policies.
Let's assume that both ALA copyright agreements are in effect for all journals. The Copyright Assignment Agreement explicitly supports limited self-archiving ("The right to use and distribute the Work on the Author’s Web site"). The Copyright Assignment Agreement further says that the author has: "The right to use and distribute the Work internally at the Author’s place of employment, and for promotional and any other non-commercial purposes." While "any other non-commercial purposes" seems to permit broad self-archiving, the specification of the "distribute the Work internally at the Author's place of employment" right seems to imply that the right to distribute the work outside of the author's place of employment is in question, which would mean that self-archiving in digital repositories could be done only in the author's institutional repository and only if access to the work was limited to institutional users. Moreover, if broad self-archiving is permitted, why single out the right to self-archive on the author's Web site? I find the wording ambiguous, and I would not recommend that anyone who wants to self-archive use this license. If its intent is to allow broad self-archiving, this should be spelled out. The Copyright License Agreement supports all types of self archiving ("Copyright of the Work remains in Author’s name, and the Author reserves all other rights"). Consequently, we can say that ALA supports "green" self-archiving, but this may be very weak under the Copyright Assignment Agreement.
Without further information, it is not possible to say that any of ALA's major journals are "gold," although Public Libraries and School Library Media Research might be. If this were true, ALA's Public Library Association and its American Association of School Librarians divisions would be ALA's gold journal publishers, with the Association of College & Research Libraries division nearly being one.
UK ETD Support: Updated EThOS Toolkit Released
The EThOSnet Project has released an updated version of the EThOS Toolkit.
Here's an excerpt from the announcement:
In addition to full details of how your institution can participate, the interactive Toolkit provides practical information on how theses can be produced by students at your Institution so they can be accessed via EThOS and from your Institutional Repository. Accessed from its new location at http://ethostoolkit.cranfield.ac.uk the toolkit provides guidance on:
- Putting forward the case for the importance of electronic theses (Culture Change)
- Outlining the business case including information on which participation options suit (Business Needs)
- Clear standards provided on technical requirements (Technical Requirements)
- Practical materials and templates to be used for authors and supervisors in contributing to EThOS (Training and Guidance)
Canadian Copyright Law: A Consumer White Paper Released
A coalition of consumer advocate organizations has released Canadian Copyright Law: A Consumer White Paper.
Here's an excerpt from the Executive Summary:
Copyright law is designed to balance the interests of creators with the interests of the public. Copyright grants creators exclusive rights in their works as a reward for creativity that also serves as an incentive for the creation of new works. These rights are not absolute, but limited in nature, scope and time. These limits are essential to copyright’s greater design, for it is at the limits of copyright owners’ rights that important consumer interests come into play.
From a consumer’s perspective, copyright’s current balance is far from perfect. In fact, many consumer dealings with copyrighted content – ordinary dealings, like copying digital music onto a portable device, or using the digital video recorders sold by cable companies – technically infringe copyright. In these and many other cases, the law is simply out of step with reality. Simple, uncontroversial amendments to the Copyright Act can fix many of these failings.
Unfortunately, copyright policy makers are not focusing on consumer interests. Instead, recent proposals to amend the Copyright Act focus on expanding rights holder’s interests at Canadian consumer’s expense. We call on Canada’s law-makers to accommodate consumer interests in any revision to the Copyright Act currently under consideration. Additionally, we call on lawmakers to revise the Copyright Act to address important consumer concerns that are not yet under consideration at all.
EDUCAUSE Publishes Higher Education IT and Cyberinfrastructure: Integrating Technologies for Scholarship
EDUCAUSE has published Higher Education IT and Cyberinfrastructure: Integrating Technologies for Scholarship.
Here's the abstract:
This 2008 ECAR research study explores higher education’s involvement in five areas of research-related information technologies: high-performance computing resources, cyberinfrastructure applications and tools, data storage and management resources, advanced network infrastructure resources, and resources for collaboration within virtual communities. The report, which is based on results of a quantitative survey of 369 U.S. and Canadian colleges and universities and consultation with cyberinfrastructure experts and 12 university executives and technical staff members, discusses who uses, who provides, and who funds cyberinfrastructure resources as well as how important each technology is and will be to research and teaching.
On ALA, CLA, and Open Access
The Canadian Library Association recently issued a new, strongly worded open access statement ("Position Statement on Open Access for Canadian Libraries"). Peter Suber commented on this statement, saying "Many organizations have called on their governments to mandate OA for publicly-funded research, but the CLA is first I've seen to regard embargo periods as a temporary compromise, justified only to help publishers adapt during a transition period."
The American Library Association is a member of the Alliance for Taxpayer Access and the Open Access Working Group, and. as such, has signed a variety of targeted statements about free access to government-funded research. The most active ALA Division in terms of open access support is the Association of College and Research Libraries, which has a number of activities geared towards promoting it.
Such statements and activities are praiseworthy, but the question remains: What kind of open access to these associations provide to their own journals?
CLA appears to embargo the current issue of Feliciter. If so, CLA cannot be said to be providing full free access to the journal; however, as embargoes go, it is a generous one.
Since it publishes more journals, the situation for ALA is more complex, and it is summarized below in a discussion of its major journals.
ALA Journal | Free Access? |
Children and Libraries: The Journal of the Association for Library Service to Children | No |
College & Research Libraries | Embargo (current volume?), with e-prints that are removed on issue publication leaving a free access gap |
Information Technology and Libraries | Six month embargo |
Library Administration and Management | No |
Library Resources & Technical Services | Embargo? (last complete issue listed on site is from 2006 and last free volume is from 2006) |
Public Libraries | Embargo? (last listed issue on site is from 2007) |
RBM: A Journal of Rare Books, Manuscripts, and Cultural Heritage | Embargo? (last listed issue on site is from 2006) |
School Library Media Research | Embargo? (last listed issue on site is from 2007) |
Reference & User Services Quarterly | No (there are no issues listed on site) |
Young Adult Library Services | No |
Given that several journals are far behind in listing back issues, some have no listed 2008 issues, and one has no back issues whatsoever, it is difficult to make definitive statements about their open access policies. It is possible that this confusion arises from difficulties in the timely maintenance of ALA journal Websites. What can be said is that, as of today, those missing digital issues are not accessible to anyone from the ALA site.
One thing is clear: it would be very helpful if ALA journals would clearly and prominently state their open access policies. Although it will not be discussed here in any detail, several journals have conflicting or unclear copyright agreement policies. It is assumed that ALA offers its two copyright agreements (Copyright Assignment Agreement and Copyright License Agreement.) for all journals, but this cannot be verified from all journal Websites.
While it is not uniform, ALA is making progress towards providing more free journal content; however, it cannot be said that ALA fully supports free access to all of its major journals. Moreover, to my knowledge, ALA itself has never made an open access position statement that is similar to CLA's and those of other library organizations, such as IFLA's (this excludes any statements by ALA divisions or joint statements). As the open access movement nears the decade point, it would seem desirable for it to unambiguously do so.
ALA is a major voice in the library community, and, if its open access efforts are to be taken seriously by publishers and scholars, it should state whether it supports green access (self-archiving), gold access (open access journals), or both. If it wants to support gold access, it should first reform its own journal publishing business model. If not, it would be helpful for it to clarify and make consistent the terms of its embargo access at an organizational vs. a divisional level.
New Comic about Canadian Copyright Reform: 51st State
Gordon Duggan has published a heavily linked comic called 51st State about the Canadian copyright reform conflict. All of the text is linked to sources that provide further background.
Presentations from APSR Workshop about Author Identity Management in Scholarly Communication Systems
The Australian Partnership for Sustainable Repositories has released presentations from its Identifying Researchers workshop. Both PDF and MP3 files are available.
Here's an excerpt from the workshop's web page:
The issue of managing researcher and author identities is a significant one that has an impact on a range of situations including, but not limited to, scholarly communications. This is an issue not only for researchers who nowadays interact with multiple identity and security systems but also for scholarly communications where the need to accurately identify authors and describe their scholarly resources is increasing in importance.