This article examines the ethical considerations and broader issues around access to digitised historical medical images. These illustrations and, later, photographs are often extremely sensitive, representing disability, disease, gender, and race in potentially harmful and problematic ways. In particular, the original metadata for such images can include demeaning and sometimes racist terms. Some of these images show sexually explicit and violent content, as well as content that was obtained without informed consent. Hiding these sensitive images can be tempting, and yet, archives are meant to be used, not locked away. Through a series of interviews with 10 archivists, librarians, and researchers based in the UK and US, the authors show that improved access to medical illustrations is essential to produce new knowledge in the humanities and medical research, as well as to bridge the gap between historical and modern understandings of the human body. Improving access to medical illustration can also help to address the "gender data gap", which has acquired mainstream visibility thanks to the work of activists such as Caroline Criado-Perez, the author of Invisible Women: Data Bias in a World Designed for Men.
| Artificial Intelligence |
| Research Data Curation and Management Works |
| Digital Curation and Digital Preservation Works |
| Open Access Works |
| Digital Scholarship |
