Archive for the 'Copyright' Category

"After Copyright Win, GSU Seeks $3.3 Million from Publishers "

Posted in Copyright, Digital Copyright Wars, Research Libraries on May 3rd, 2016

Andrew Albanese has published "After Copyright Win, GSU Seeks $3.3 Million from Publishers" in Publishers Weekly.

Here's an excerpt:

After winning a key copyright decision, attorneys for Georgia State University want the publishers who brought the suit to pay more than $3.3 million dollars in fees and costs.

Digital Curation and Digital Preservation Works | Open Access Works | Digital Scholarship | Digital Scholarship Sitemap

Be Sociable, Share!

    "The Mystery of Creative Commons Licenses"

    Posted in Copyright, Creative Commons/Open Licenses, Open Access, Publishing, Scholarly Journals on April 29th, 2016

    De Gruyter Open has released "The Mystery of Creative Commons Licenses" by Witold Kieńć.

    Here's an excerpt:

    While more than half of open access papers are published under the terms of a liberal Creative Commons Attribution Licence, the majority of authors of open access works seem not to accept the terms of either this or any other Creative Commons license.

    Despite the fact that the majority of journals indexed in the Directory of Open Access Journals use liberal Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) licence as a default, and that probably more than half of all articles published in open access serials are published under the terms of this licence, academic authors seem not to support liberal licensing. How is it possible? Are authors of more than 600 thousand CC-BY licensed works invisible in surveys? Or do they publish under the terms of this license against their will?

    Digital Curation and Digital Preservation Works | Open Access Works | Digital Scholarship | Digital Scholarship Sitemap

    Be Sociable, Share!

      "Policy: Google Books: The Final Chapter?"

      Posted in Copyright, Digital Copyright Wars, Google and Other Search Engines, Publishing on April 29th, 2016

      Walt Crawford has published "Policy: Google Books: The Final Chapter?" in Cites & Insights: Crawford at Large.

      Here's an excerpt:

      On Monday, April 18, 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear the Authors Guild appeal of a district court decision finding, once again, that Google Books Search is fair use. . . .

      That should be the final chapter in this decade-long epic case, and maybe I should stop right here.

      But let's look at a couple of the early commentaries after the denial (two of many), then go back for the usual chronological citations and notes on items since the last coverage of this legal marathon. The question mark in the essay's title? Well, the Authors Litigation Guild (the middle word isn't part of the name, but maybe it should be) seems as incapable of admitting defeat as it apparently is of recognizing that it only represents the interests of a few hundred or few thousand writers. And, of course, there's the enticing if unlikely counter possibility: what if Google asked to recover its legal costs, which must surely be in the millions of dollars?

      See also: “Google Case Ends, but Copyright Fight Goes On.”

      Digital Curation and Digital Preservation Works | Open Access Works | Digital Scholarship | Digital Scholarship Sitemap

      Be Sociable, Share!

        "How Large is the ‘Public Domain’?: A Comparative Analysis of Ringer’s 1961 Copyright Renewal Study and HathiTrust CRMS Data"

        Posted in Copyright, Public Domain on April 25th, 2016

        College & Research Libraries has released an e-print of "How Large is the 'Public Domain'?: A Comparative Analysis of Ringer's 1961 Copyright Renewal Study and HathiTrust CRMS Data" by John P. Wilkin.

        Here's an excerpt:

        The 1961 Copyright Office study on renewals, authored by Barbara Ringer, has cast an outsized influence on discussions of the U.S. 1923-1963 public domain. As more concrete data emerges from initiatives such as the large-scale determination process in the Copyright Review Management System project, questions are raised about the reliability or meaning of the Ringer data. A closer examination of both the Ringer study and CRMS data demonstrates fundamental misunderstandings and misrepresentations of the Ringer data, as well as possible methodological issues. Estimates of the size of the corpus of public domain books published in the U.S. from 1923-1963 have been inflated by problematic assumptions, and we should be able to correct mistaken conclusions with reasonable effort.

        Digital Scholarship | Digital Scholarship Sitemap

        Be Sociable, Share!

          Developments in the Authors Guild v. Google and Cambridge University Press v. Patton (GSU E-Reserves) Cases

          Posted in Copyright, Digital Copyright Wars on April 19th, 2016

          The Supreme Court has declined to hear an appeal of the Authors Guild v. Google case, leaving in place the 2015 ruling by the United States Court of Appeals 2nd Circuit in favor of Google.

          See: "Supreme Court Rejects Google Books Appeal."

          Judge Orinda Evans has issued a remand decision in the Cambridge University Press v. Patton case that significantly reduces the number counts that the plaintiffs prevailed on.

          See: "Publishers' Loss in GSU Copyright Case Just Got a Little Worse."

          Digital Scholarship | Digital Scholarship Sitemap

          Be Sociable, Share!

            DPLA, Creative Commons, Europeana, and Partners Launch RightsStatements.org

            Posted in Copyright, Creative Commons/Open Licenses on April 15th, 2016

            The Digital Public Library of America, the Creative Commons, Europeana, and other partners have launched RightsStatements.org .

            Here's an excerpt from the announcement:

            In May 2015, the International Rights Statements Working Group released two white papers with our recommendations for establishing standardized rights statements for describing copyright and reuse status of digital cultural heritage materials, and the enabling technical infrastructure for those statements. After working for nearly a year to implement the recommendations of the white papers, the Digital Public Library of America and Europeana are proud to announce the launch of RightsStatements.org.

            Digital Scholarship | Digital Scholarship Sitemap

            Be Sociable, Share!

              "A Spiritual Successor to Aaron Swartz Is Angering Publishers All Over Again"

              Posted in Copyright, Digital Copyright Wars, Open Access, Publishing on April 7th, 2016

              David Kravets has published "A Spiritual Successor to Aaron Swartz Is Angering Publishers All Over Again" in Ars Technica.

              Here's an excerpt:

              Meet Alexandra Elbakyan, the developer of Sci-Hub, a Pirate Bay-like site for the science nerd. It's a portal that offers free and searchable access "to most publishers, especially well-known ones."

              Digital Scholarship | Digital Scholarship Sitemap

              Be Sociable, Share!

                Cambridge Press v. Georgia State University: "Here We Go Again: Latest GSU Ruling an Odd Victory for Libraries"

                Posted in Copyright, Digital Copyright Wars, Publishing, Research Libraries, Scholarly Journals on April 6th, 2016

                Kevin Smith has published "Here We Go Again: Latest GSU Ruling an Odd Victory for Libraries" in Scholarly Communications @ Duke.

                Here's an excerpt:

                So this ruling, like each ruling in the case, is clearly a disaster for the plaintiff publishers. Once again it establishes that there is significant space for fair use in higher education, even when that use is not transformative. Nevertheless, it is a difficult victory for libraries, in the sense that the analysis it uses is not one we can replicate; we simply do not have access to the extensive data about revenue, of which Judge Evans makes such complex use.

                Digital Scholarship | Digital Scholarship Sitemap

                Be Sociable, Share!

                  "Digital Piracy Debunked: A Short Note on Digital Threats and Intermediary Liability"

                  Posted in Copyright, Digital Copyright Wars on March 29th, 2016

                  The Center for Internet and Society has released "Digital Piracy Debunked: A Short Note on Digital Threats and Intermediary Liability."

                  Here's an excerpt:

                  This short paper shows that the "digital threat" discourse is based on shaky grounds. Two related arguments might run against this approach. First, market conditions might incentivise piracy. Additionally, there are raising doubts over the argument that piracy is a threat to creativity, especially in the digital environment.

                  Digital Scholarship | Digital Scholarship Sitemap

                  Be Sociable, Share!

                    Creative Commons Integration, from A to Z

                    Posted in Copyright, Creative Commons/Open Licenses on March 25th, 2016

                    The Creative Commons has released Creative Commons Integration, from A to Z.

                    Here's an excerpt:

                    What: This toolkit covers the elements for a basic Creative Commons platform integration, including aligning legal terms to CC tools; installing the CC license chooser; displaying CC licensed content with the correct logos and links; and how to communicate CC to your users.

                    Digital Scholarship | Digital Scholarship Sitemap

                    Be Sociable, Share!

                      Authors Guild vs. Google on Supreme Court Calendar for April 1

                      Posted in Copyright, Digital Copyright Wars, Mass Digitizaton on March 24th, 2016

                      According to an article by Andrew Albanese in Publishers Weekly, the Authors Guild vs. Google case is on the Supreme Court's calendar for its April 1 conference.

                      See also: "After Latest Filings, Google Case Now in Supreme Court's Hands."

                      Digital Scholarship | Digital Scholarship Sitemap

                      Be Sociable, Share!

                        "Creative Commons Licenses: Empowering Open Access"

                        Posted in Copyright, Creative Commons/Open Licenses, Open Access, Publishing on March 14th, 2016

                        Thomas Margoni and Diane M. Peters have self-archived "Creative Commons Licenses: Empowering Open Access."

                        Here's an excerpt:

                        Open access (OA) is a concept that in recent years has acquired popularity and widespread recognition. International statements and scholarly analysis converge on the following main characteristics of open access: free availability on the public Internet, permission for any users to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, and link to the full texts of these articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, and use them for any other lawful purpose, without financial, legal, or technical barriers other than those inseparable from gaining access to the Internet itself. The only legal constraint on reproduction and distribution, and the only role for copyright in this domain, should be to give authors control over the integrity of their work and the right to be properly acknowledged and cited.

                        Digital Scholarship | Digital Scholarship Sitemap

                        Be Sociable, Share!

                          Page 1 of 7212345...102030...Last »

                          DigitalKoans

                          DigitalKoans

                          Digital Scholarship

                          Copyright © 2005-2016 by Charles W. Bailey, Jr.

                          Creative Commons License
                          This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license.